1:02 AM 1/27/2019 - Operation Trump and New Abwehr - Google Search
- Get link
- Other Apps
 | ||
| Putin as German asset or agent - Google Search | ||
Sat, 26 Jan 2019 11:27:41 -0500
|
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 2
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 3
Saved Stories - Trump Investigations  |
|---|
| "Trump liar" - Google News: Letter: Don't bother talking to Trump - Salt Lake Tribune |
Letter: Don't bother talking to Trump Salt Lake Tribune
In his first two years since taking office, President Donald Trump has uttered approximately 6,820 attested lies or misleading statements. He thus qualifies as a ...
 |
| Lawfare - Hard National Security Choices: Roger Stone’s Arrest Was Appropriate, Not Heavy-Handed |
A Lawfare post from Friday—“Get Me Roger Stone”—well and thoroughly explained the most recent indictment from the Mueller team. The authors also defended the decision to arrest Stone rather than to issue to him a summons compelling his voluntary appearance in court:
|
Read the whole story
· · · · · ·
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 4
“Due to ongoing threats against his family,” Michael Cohen announced yesterday that he was postponing his highly-anticipated congressional testimony.
The threats are coming from the White House where President Trump won’t stop talking about Michael Cohen’s father-in-law, a guy by the name of Fima Shusterman.
On a phone call January 12th with Fox News host Jeanine Pirro, the president of the United States launched into an extraordinary attack on Cohen’s father-in-law, a private citizen:
TRUMP: He should give information maybe on his father-in-law. Because that’s the one that people want to look. Because where does that money? That’s the money in the family. And I guess he didn’t want to talk about his father-in-law. Trying to get his sentence reduced. So it’s pretty sad. He is weak. And is very sad to watch a thing like that. I couldn’t care less.
PIRRO: What is his father-in-law’s name?
TRUMP: I don’t know but you’ll find out and you’ll look into it. Because nobody knows what’s going on other there.
The implication here is that Shusterman, a Ukrainian emigre, is some sort of Russian organized crime figure, although in typical Trump fashion he provides no evidence.
As readers of my book know, Trump knows that Shusterman is “the money” in the Cohen family because his business benefited from it.
Even with the spotlight the president has put on him, we still know very little about Michael Cohen’s father-in-law, Fima Shusterman. The only bit of insight comes from his 1993 testimony in federal court. So here goes.
Shusterman had pleaded guilty to the charge of conspiracy to defraud the United States. In exchange for leniency, he agreed to testify at the trial of Harold Wapnick, his accountant. Shusterman was sentenced to probation and fined $5,000.
On May 13, 1993, Shusterman took the witness stand in the court of Judge Carol Amon. Although he spoke some English, he had a translator present at his own request “because I do not understand English 100 percent.”
Q. Good morning, Mr. Shusterman. A. Good morning. Q. How old are you, sir? A. 48. Q. Are you married, Mr. Shusterman? A. Yes, I am. Q. And do you have any children, sir? A. Yes, I have a daughter. Q. Where were you born, Mr. Shusterman? A. In the Soviet Union. Q. When did you come to the United States, sir? A. In May '75. Q. And are you a citizen, Mr. Shusterman? A. Yes, I am. Q. Are you employed? A. Yes. Q. Where are you employed? A. I'm employed as a manager with Future Knits. Q. And are you a co-owner of of Future Knits, sir? A. Yes, I am. Q. Who are your partners? A. My partners are Shalva Botier and Edward Zubok. Q. What business is Future Knits in? A. This is a knitting factory. Q. When was Future Knits established, sir? A. I'm not sure. I think it was established in '81. Q. Future Knits, sir, when was Future Knits established? A. In 1988. Q. And prior to Future Knits, sir, how were you employed? A. I was employed with S&Z Fashions and LVA Corp. Q. Were you a co-owner of those corporations? A. Yes, I was. Q. And were your partners the same individuals as your partners in Future Knits? A. Yes, correct. Q. Were S&Z Fashions and LVA also in the knitting business? A. Yes. Q. When did you join S&Z Fashions and LVA? A. In July of '84. Q. Between years 1985 to 1988, were you involved with any other corporations other than S&Z and LVA and Future Knits? A. No. Q. Did you have an ownership or office position with any other corporation, sir? A. Yes. I was secretary with Martha Cab Corporation, and Bar Trans Corporation. Q. And, sir, is Barn Transportation with an "N" end, B-A-R-N? A. Barn, B-A-R-N. Q. Who is shareholder of Martha and Barn, sir? A. My wife was. Q. Are you an officer of those corporations? A. Yes, I am.
Shusterman was also secretary of N.Y. Funky Taxi Corp. and New York Fulton Taxi Corp.
Today, the chief executive of N.Y. Funky Taxi, Martha Cab and Barn Trans is Michael Cohen, who married Mr. Shusterman’s daughter, Laura, a year following her father’s guilty plea and court appearance. Cohen owns and operates a fleet of cabs in New York and Chicago.
Note to my readers: This work costs me both time and money (in the case of this transcript quite a bit of money). I do this work for free in the hope that people will find it valuable. If you agree, the best way you can support this work is by purchasing my book, Trump/Russia, which has much more information on the president’s decades-long connection to Russian criminal money.
Q. Mr. Shusterman, have you been convicted of a crime? A. Yes. Q. What crime were you convicted of, sir? A. Conspiracy. Q. When were you convicted? A. In March of this year, '93. Q. How were you convicted, sir? A. I pleaded guilty. Q. And, Mr. Shusterman, in connection with your guilty plea, did you enter into an agreement with the government? A. Yes. Q. Would you tell the ladies and gentlemen of the jury, Mr. Shusterman, what your understanding is of that agreement? A. My understanding is that I obligated myself to fully, 100 percent, cooperate with the government. Q. And did the government agree to do anything in return, sir? A. Yes, they did. Q. What did they agree to do, sir? A. They would advise the judge about my full cooperation and about my help rendered in their investigations. Q. Mr. Shusterman, have you been sentenced yet? A. No, not yet. Q. Do you know what sentence you are facing, sir? A. Yes. Q. What is that, sir? A. Five years in prison, and up to $250,000 in fines. Q. Sir, have any promises been made to you regarding your sentence? A. No. Q. Do you know who will be sentencing you, Mr. Shusterman? A. Yes, I do. Q. And who is that, sir? A. Judge Amon. Q. Mr. Shusterman, you've testified that you pled guilty to the crime of conspiracy. Could you tell the ladies and gentlemen of the jury what is it that you did? A. I concealed income from the state, and I cashed checks in the amounts that exceeded $10,000. Q. Mr. Shusterman, what did you need this cash for, sir? A. To operate our business.
Shusterman goes on to say that from 1984 to 1988 he would regularly bring checks from his customers made out to S&Z Fashions, LVA, and Future Knits and leave them in Wapnick’s office.
A few days later, Shusterman would return and collect cash, always in amounts more than $10,000, in a paper bag or envelope. Wapnick would keep 3 percent for his services.
The total amount cashed with the Wapnicks was “somewhere between five and five and a half million dollars,” Shusterman testified.
Shusterman is then cross-examined by Harold Wapnick, who does a terrible job of representing himself with convoluted lines of questions.
However, he does stumble into a couple of things that are interesting in light of Trump’s claims that Shusterman is “the money in the family.”
Wapnick: Sir, you own a -- you own 40 percent of a 40-machine factory, sir? A. No. Q. What percentage do you own of a 40-machine factory, sir? A. 15 percent as of today. Q. 15 percent. Would you say that the 15 percent value is in excess of a million dollars, sir? A. If you pay me half a million I'll sell it to you gladly. Q. Thank you. How about the -- do you own five -- 9 taxicab medallions? And are they worth about two million dollars? The Court: Wait a minute. I don't think he gave an answer. Q. Are they worth about two million dollars, sir? A. Did you say two million? Q. Let's say $170,000 apiece, and we multiply it by nine, so, okay -- what's a half a million dollars among friends. Is it worth --- The court: I take it you're withdrawing your last question. Wapnick: No I'm asking him is it worth a million and a half dollars, sir. Shusterman: Only on paper.
A decade later, beginning in 2003, Shusterman made the first of three apartment purchases at Trump World Tower across from the United Nations building in Manhattan. By 2005, Shusterman had spent $7.6 million on Trump’s properties.
So where did this money come from and what did Trump know about it?
Read the whole story
· · · · · · · ·
- Get link
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment