3:40 AM 4/17/2019 - Yes, investigate the investigators!
- Get link
- Other Apps
3:40 AM 4/17/2019 - Yes, investigate the investigators!
Barr Forms Team to Probe Possible FBI Abuses In Trump-Russia ...
"Barr to investigate FBI" - Google News
Trump: 'Investigate the Investigators!' - Washington Examiner Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:14:00 GMT - 1:31 AM 4/17/2019
The symbol of "The end of the Western Civilisation" or the intention to create such a symbol? - M.N. - 1:02 AM 4/17/2019
Psychological and mental health problems in Hasidic community
2:57 AM 4/17/2019 - Psychological and mental health problems in Hasidic community: A Young Hasidic Man Leads a Gay Double Life in ‘Black Hat’
-
The investigate-the-investigators mantra follows a series of official actions in that direction recently.
FBI is a very sick, Mafia and Nazi style type of the organisation staffed with shrewd but brainless and soulless psychopaths. It has to be studied and researched in depth. Their sick, unlawful, low, cynical, gypsy mentality type "secrets" and "mysteries" have to be exposed and revealed. This stupid, brainless, ever hungry, dysfunctional, ugly Beast feeds on America and her people. They are worse than KGB and Gestapo, and they are stupider too.
Their "hair analysts" gave the wrong testimonies and sent the innocent people to prison simply because they wanted to "make it", to serve and to move up the ladder. Read about it, including my blogs and sites.
They have to be destroyed, abolished, and those who deserve it should be prosecuted themselves. I could not and still cannot believe that all this, including their infamous COINTELPRO "operations" were happening in America!
And in addition to all that, they are simply incompetent and are not able to carry out their duties properly. I think that the FBI is the major threat to the sanity and the mental health of the American people. The FBI "COINTELPRO specialists" literally and deliberately drive you crazy, and those very talanted artistic nincompoops sincerely believe, in accordance with their limited intellectual capacities, that this is exactly their job to do.
They became the inspiring model for the many monstrous "secret security services" around the world, and lately for the Israeli private spying firms who developed and expanded ad criminal absurdum the COINTELPRO tactics and techniques. Read about those firms activities and interference in 2016 Elections.
And you better investigate all of the above! Michael Novakhov - 4:51 AM 4/16/2019
-
3:37 AM 4/15/2019 - How Mueller's hunt for a Russia-Trump conspiracy came up short - Reuters | Ricardo Rossello: "Helpful to have another presidential candidate raising awareness of #PuertoRico's lack of political representation. Thank you, @PeteButtigieg! We need to end 2nd class citizenship immediately and respect the will of the people who have twice voted for #equality through #statehood"
Ricardo Rossello:
-
Yes, investigate the investigators | News, Sports, Jobs Williamsport Sun-Gazette
Attorney General William Barr dared to use the “s-word.” He said in congressional testimony that the Trump campaign had been spied on by the U.S. governme.
In Senate testimony last week, Attorney General William Barr used the word “spying” to refer to the Obama administration, um, spying on the Trump campaign. Of course, fainting spells ensued, with the media-Democrat complex in meltdown. Former FBI Director Jim Comey tut-tutted that he was confused by Barr’s comments, since the FBI’s “surveillance” had been authorized by a court.
(Needless to say, the former director neglected to mention that the court was not informed that the bureau’s “evidence” for the warrants was unverified hearsay paid for by the Clinton campaign.)
The pearl-clutching was predictable. Less than a year ago, we learned the Obama administration had used a confidential informant — a spy — to approach at least three Trump campaign officials in the months leading up to the 2016 election, straining to find proof that the campaign was complicit in the Kremlin’s hacking of Democratic emails.
As night follows day, we were treated to the same Beltway hysteria we got this week: Silly semantic carping over the word “spying” — which, regardless of whether a judge authorizes it, is merely the covert gathering of intelligence about a suspected wrongdoer, organization or foreign power.
There is no doubt that the Obama administration spied on the Trump campaign. As Barr made clear, the real question is: What predicated the spying? Was there a valid reason for it, strong enough to overcome our norm against political spying? Or was it done rashly? Was a politically motivated decision made to use highly intrusive investigative tactics when a more measured response would have sufficed, such as a “defensive briefing” that would have warned the Trump campaign of possible Russian infiltration?
Last year, when the “spy” games got underway, James Clapper, Obama’s director of national intelligence, conceded that, yes, the FBI did run an informant — “spy” is such an icky word — at Trump campaign officials; but, we were told, this was merely to investigate Russia. Cross Clapper’s heart, it had nothing to do with the Trump campaign. No, no, no. Indeed, the Obama administration only used an informant because — bet you didn’t know this — doing so is the most benign, least intrusive mode of conducting an investigation.
Me? I’m thinking the tens of thousands of convicts serving lengthy sentences due to the penetration of their schemes by informants would beg to differ. (Gee, Mr. Gambino, I assure you, this was just for you own good . . .) And imagine the Democrats’ response if, say, the Bush administration had run a covert intelligence operative against Obama 2008 campaign officials, including the campaign’s co-chairman. Surely David Axelrod, Chuck Schumer, The New York Times and Rachel Maddow would chirp that “all is forgiven” once they heard Republicans punctiliously parse the nuances between “spying” and “surveillance”; between “spies” and “informants”; and between investigating campaign officials versus investigating the campaign proper — and the candidate.
The “spying” question arose last spring, when we learned that Stefan Halper, a longtime source for the CIA and British intelligence, had been tasked during the FBI’s Russia investigation to chat up three Trump campaign advisers: Carter Page, George Papadopoulos and Sam Clovis. This was in addition to earlier revelations that the Obama Justice Department and FBI had obtained warrants to eavesdrop on Page’s communications, beginning about three weeks before the 2016 election.
The fact that spying had occurred was too clear for credible denial. The retort, then, was misdirection: There had been no spying on Donald Trump or his campaign; just on a few potential bad actors in the campaign’s orbit.
It was nonsense then, and it is nonsense now.
The pols making these claims about what the FBI was doing might have been well served by listening to what the FBI said it was doing.
There was, for example, then-Director Comey’s breathtaking public testimony before the House Intelligence Committee on March 20, 2017. Comey did not just confirm the existence of a counterintelligence probe of Russian espionage to influence the 2016 election — notwithstanding that the government customarily refuses to confirm the existence of any investigation, let alone a classified counterintelligence investigation. The director further identified the Trump campaign as a subject of the probe, even though, to avoid smearing people, the Justice Department never identifies uncharged persons or organizations that are under investigation. As Comey put it:
“I have been authorized by the Department of Justice to confirm that the FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and that includes investigating the nature of any links between individuals associated with the Trump campaign and the Russian government and whether there was any coordination between the campaign and Russia’s efforts . . .”
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration 2:04
Loaded: 7.95%
0:00
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -2:04
1x
- Chapters
- descriptions off, selected
- captions settings, opens captions settings dialog
- captions off, selected
- en (Main), selected
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
Current Time 0:00
/
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -0:00
1x
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
Barr thinks spying occurred on Trump campaign
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 2:04
Remaining Time -2:04
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
End of dialog window.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Remaining Time -0:00
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button.
The FBI was spying, and it was doing so in an investigation of the Trump campaign. That is why, for over two years, Washington has been entranced by the specter of “Trump collusion with Russia” — not Page or Papadopoulos collusion with Russia. Comey went to extraordinary lengths to tell the world that the FBI was not merely zeroing in on individuals of varying ranks in the campaign; the main question was whether the Trump campaign itself — the entity — had “coordinated” in Russia’s espionage operation.
In the months prior to the election, as its Trump-Russia investigation ensued, some of the overtly political, rabidly anti-Trump FBI agents running the probe discussed among themselves the prospect of stopping Trump, or of using the investigation as an “insurance policy” in the highly unlikely event that Trump won the election. After Trump’s stunning victory, the Obama administration had a dilemma: How could the investigation be maintained if Trump were told about it? After all, as president, he would have the power to shut it down.
On Jan. 6, 2017, Comey, Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan and National Security Agency chief Michael Rogers visited President-elect Trump in New York to brief him on the Russia investigation.
Just one day earlier, at the White House, Comey and then–Acting Attorney General Sally Yates had met with the political leadership of the Obama administration — President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and national security adviser Susan Rice — to discuss withholding information about the Russia investigation from the incoming Trump administration.
Rice put this sleight-of-hand a bit more delicately in the memo about the Oval Office meeting (written two weeks after the fact, as Rice was leaving her office minutes after Trump’s inauguration):
“President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia. [Emphasis added.]”
It is easy to understand why Obama officials needed to discuss withholding information from Trump. They knew that the Trump campaign — not just some individuals tangentially connected to the campaign — was the subject of an ongoing FBI counterintelligence probe. An informant had been run at campaign officials. The FISA surveillance of Page was underway — in fact, right before Trump’s inauguration, the Obama administration obtained a new court warrant for 90 more days of spying.
In each Page surveillance warrant application, after describing Russia’s espionage operations, the Justice Department told the court, “The FBI believes that the Russian Government’s efforts are being coordinated with Candidate #1’s campaign[.]” Candidate #1 was Donald Trump — now, the president-elect.
The fact that the Trump campaign was under investigation for collaborating with Russia was not just withheld from the incoming president; it had been withheld from the congressional “Gang of Eight.”
In his March 2017 House testimony, answering questions by Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), then-director Comey acknowledged that congressional leadership was not told about the Trump-Russia probe during quarterly briefings from July 2016 through early March 2017, because “it was a matter of such sensitivity.” Let’s put aside that the need to alert Congress to sensitive matters is exactly why there is a Gang of Eight (comprised of bipartisan leaders of both chambers and their intelligence committees).
Manifestly, the matter was deemed too “sensitive” for disclosure because that would have involved telling Republican congressional leadership that the incumbent Democratic administration was using foreign counterintelligence powers to investigate the Republican presidential campaign, and the party’s nominee, as suspected clandestine agents of the Kremlin.
How to keep the investigation going when Trump took office? The plan called for Comey to put the new president at ease by telling him he was not a suspect. This would not have been a credible assurance if Comey had informed Trump that (a) his campaign had been under investigation for months, and (b) the FBI had told a federal court it suspected Trump campaign officials were complicit in Russia’s cyber-espionage operation.
So, consistent with President Obama’s instructions at the Jan. 5, 2017, Oval Office meeting, information about the investigation would be withheld from the president-elect. The next day, the intelligence chiefs would tell Trump only about Russia’s espionage, not about the Trump campaign’s suspected “coordination” with the Kremlin. Then, Comey would apprise Trump about only a sliver of the Steele dossier — just the lurid story about peeing prostitutes, not the dossier’s principal allegations of a traitorous Trump-Russia conspiracy.
This strategy did not sit well with everyone at the FBI. Shortly before meeting with Trump on Jan. 6, Comey consulted his top advisers about the plan to tell Trump he was not a suspect. In later Senate testimony, Comey admitted that there was an objection from one FBI official:
“One of the members of the leadership team had a view that, although it was technically true [that] we did not have a counterintelligence file case open on then-President-elect Trump[,] . . . because we’re looking at the potential . . . coordination between the campaign and Russia, because it was . . . President-elect Trump’s campaign, this person’s view was, inevitably, [Trump’s] behavior, [Trump’s] conduct will fall within the scope of that work.”
Note that Comey did not refer to “potential coordination” between, say, Carter Page or Paul Manafort and Russia. The director was unambiguous: The FBI was investigating “potential coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia.”
Perspicaciously, Comey’s unidentified adviser connected the dots: (a) because the FBI’s investigation focused on the campaign, and (b) since the campaign was Trump’s campaign, it was necessarily true that (c) Trump’s own conduct was under FBI scrutiny.
Then-director Comey’s reliance on the trivial administrative fact that the FBI had not written Trump’s name on the investigative file did not change the reality that Trump, manifestly, was the main subject of the “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation.
Remember last year’s hullabaloo over special counsel Robert Mueller’s demand to interview the president? What need would there have been to conduct such an interview if Trump were not a subject of the investigation? Why would Trump’s political opponents have spent the last two years demanding that Mueller be permitted to complete his probe of collusion and obstruction if it were not understood that the investigation — including the spying, or, if you prefer, the electronic surveillance, the informant sorties, and the information gathered by national-security letter demands — was centrally about Donald Trump?
That brings us to a final point. Congressional investigations have established that the Obama Justice Department and the FBI used the Steele dossier to obtain FISA court warrants against Page.
The dossier, a Clinton campaign opposition research project (again, a fact withheld from the FISA court), was essential to the required probable-cause showing; the FBI’s former deputy director, Andrew McCabe, testified that without the dossier there would have been no warrant.
So . . . what did the dossier say? The lion’s share of it alleged that the Trump campaign was conspiring with the Kremlin to corrupt the election, including by hacking and publicizing Democratic Party e-mails. This allegation was based on unidentified Russian sources whom the FBI could not corroborate; then-director Comey told Senate leaders that the FBI used the information because the bureau judged former British spy Christopher Steele to be credible, even though (a) Steele did not make any of the observations the court was being asked to rely on, and (b) Steele had misled the FBI about his contacts with the media — with whom Steele and his Clinton campaign allies were sharing the same information he was giving the bureau.
It is a major investigative step to seek surveillance warrants from the FISA court. Unlike using an informant (a human spy), for which no court authorization is necessary, applications for FISA surveillance require approvals at the highest levels of the Justice Department and the FBI. After going through that elaborate process, the Obama Justice Department and the FBI presented to the court the dossier’s allegations that the Trump campaign was coordinating with Russia to undermine the 2016 election.
To be sure, no sensible person argues that the government should refrain from investigating if, based on compelling evidence, the FBI suspects individuals — even campaign officials, even a party’s nominee — of acting as clandestine agents of a hostile foreign power. The question is: What should trigger such an investigation in a democratic republic whose norms strongly discourage an incumbent administration’s use of the government’s spying powers against political opponents?
The Obama administration decided that this norm did not apply to the Trump campaign. If all the Obama administration had been trying to do was check out a few bad apples with suspicious Russia ties, the FBI could easily have alerted any of a number of Trump campaign officials with solid national-security credentials — Rudy Giuliani, Jeff Sessions, Chris Christie. The agents could have asked for the campaign’s help. Instead, Obama officials made the Trump campaign the subject of a counterintelligence investigation.
That only makes sense if the Obama administration’s premise was that Donald Trump himself was a Russian agent.
Andrew C. McCarthy, a former federal prosecutor, is a contributing editor of National Review.
Read the whole story
· · · · · · · · · · · ·
The high cost of William Barr’s spying allegations The Washington Post
David Kris, former assistant attorney general for national security from 2009 to 2011, is co-founder of the consulting firm Culper Partners. Michael Morell, a Post ...
Electronic surveillance isn't spying; it's much more powerful | TheHill The Hill
The silly semantical jousting over 'spying' versus 'surveillance' is a distraction.
With Evidence, Rush Proves Hillary Paid for the Steele Dossier RushLimbaugh.com
Apr 16, 2019. RUSH: Randy in Carthage, New York. It's great to have you here. How are you, sir? CALLER: Hi, Rush. It's an honor. Rush, I just got two questions ...
GOP senators renew request for more information about FBI Clinton email probe POLITICO
Three Senate Committee chairmen have renewed their request for additional information from an inspector general report on the FBI's handling of an ...
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 2
Trump vetoes measure to end US involvement in Yemen war WCTI12.com
President Donald Trump on Tuesday vetoed a bill passed by Congress to end U. S. military assistance in Saudi Arabia's war in Yemen. In a break with the ...
VIPS: The Fly in the Mueller Ointment Consortium News
The bug in Mueller's report to be released Thursday is that he accepts that the Russian government interfered in the election. Trump should challenge that, says ...
Devin Nunes looking for 'some type of setup' in 3 areas of Mueller's report Washington Examiner
House Intelligence Committee ranking member Devin Nunes, R-Calif., divulged three key sections on "some type of setup" that he will be looking for in special ...
Yes, investigate the investigators | News, Sports, Jobs Williamsport Sun-Gazette
Attorney General William Barr dared to use the “s-word.” He said in congressional testimony that the Trump campaign had been spied on by the U.S. governme.
Barr Forms Team to Probe Possible FBI Abuses In Trump-Russia ...
Barr Forms Team to Probe Possible FBI Abuses In Trump-Russia Investigation
President Trump is taking up a common refrain of his allies who are critical of special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia-focused probe: Investigate the investigators.
Trump on Monday morning added extra emphasis to the refrain, tweeting about Mueller, 2016 Democratic rival Hillary Clinton and others, "Mueller, and the A.G. based on Mueller findings (and great intelligence), have already ruled No Collusion, No Obstruction. These were crimes committed by Crooked Hillary, the DNC, Dirty Cops and others! INVESTIGATE THE INVESTIGATORS!
Read the whole story
· ·
Eerie photo of the altar inside Notre Dame, by Reuters' Philippe Wojazer.
The symbol of "The end of the Western Civilisation" or the intention to create such a symbol? - M.N. - 1:02 AM 4/17/2019
16/04/19 11:43 from Michael Novakhov on Twitter from Michael_Novakhov (1 sites)
I do support Mr. Barr's intent to investigate the FBI and the other related agencies. And needless to say, it has to be bipartisan, non-political, absolutely objective, and in depth. Posted by MichaelNovakhov on Tuesday, April 16th, 2019...
Read the whole story
· ·
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 3
You Retweeted
A Young Hasidic Man Leads a Gay Double Life in ‘Black Hat’ http://dlvr.it/R2yxny
Psychological and mental health problems in Hasidic community
2:57 AM 4/17/2019 - Psychological and mental health problems in Hasidic community: A Young Hasidic Man Leads a Gay Double Life in ‘Black Hat’
-
Read the whole story
· ·
President Trump is taking up a common refrain of his allies who are critical of special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia-focused probe: Investigate the investigators.
Trump on Monday morning added extra emphasis to the refrain, tweeting about Mueller, 2016 Democratic rival Hillary Clinton and others, "Mueller, and the A.G. based on Mueller findings (and great intelligence), have already ruled No Collusion, No Obstruction. These were crimes committed by Crooked Hillary, the DNC, Dirty Cops and others! INVESTIGATE THE INVESTIGATORS!
The investigate-the-investigators mantra follows a series of official actions in that direction recently.
During testimony last week before a House committee, Attorney General William Barr said he is putting together a team to examine the Department of Justice's original probe in 2016 about contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia elements — including whether the DOJ, then under Obama administration control, improperly pried into Trump campaign matters.
"I want to make sure there was no unauthorized surveillance,” Barr told lawmakers. “The question is whether it was adequately predicated. And I'm not suggesting it was not adequately predicated. But I need to explore that,” Barr said.
Barr’s use of the term “spying” drew outrage from many Democrats.
Trump’s comments come amidst an independent investigation into possible FISA abuse and other Justice Department actions by DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz. When it was launched in March 2018, DOJ’s inspector general said it would “examine the Justice Department’s and the FBI’s compliance with legal requirements, and with applicable DOJ and FBI policies and procedures, in applications filed with the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.” Barr said the investigation will conclude by May or June.
And U.S. attorney John Huber was also tasked by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions in March 2018 with looking into the actions by the DOJ and FBI as well. The progress that Huber’s office has made, if any, is not known.
Meanwhile, Devin Nunes, R-Calif., the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, has also been putting together a series of referrals of Justice Department and FBI officials for months. Nunes is trying to meet privately with Barr about the referrals.
And in recent weeks, House Judiciary Committee ranking member Doug Collins, R-Ga., has released transcripts of the private interviews of former FBI agent Peter Strzok, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page, Justice Department official Bruce Ohr, his wife and former Fusion GPS contractor Nellie Ohr, former Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos, former top FBI official Bill Priestap, and former FBI general counsel James Baker. Collins and fellow House Republicans suggest institutional plotting against the Trump campaign at the highest levels of federal law enforcement.
Republicans have criticized the way the DOJ and FBI conducted themselves during the Trump-Russia investigation, pointing to, among other the things, the use of the unverified so-called Trump Dossier by the FBI to obtain FISA warrants to spy on onetime Trump campaign official Carter Page. That dossier, compiled by British ex-spy Christopher Steele during his time working for Fusion GPS, was funded in part by Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee through the Perkins Coie law firm. The dossier was given to more than a dozen members of the media and found its way into the DOJ and FBI through various individuals.
Democrats have countered that the FBI acted appropriately in obtaining the authority to surveil Trump campaign associates over concerns about Russian influence. In its rebuttal to the House Intelligence GOP memo, Democrats said the DOJ and FBI "met the rigor, transparency, and evidentiary basis needed to meet FISA's probable cause requirement."
Mueller’s report — with Barr’s redactions — is expected this week. Congressional Democrats want the entire unredacted, 400-page document. A court fight may be looming over access to all the materials.
Read the whole story
· · ·
Barr says spying on Trump campaign 'did occur,' but provides no ...
CNN-Apr 10, 2019
Washington (CNN) Attorney General William Barr suggested to ... the "genesis" of the FBI'scounterintelligence investigation that began in 2016 ...
Attorney General Barr puts team in place to investigate FBI probe of ...
Washington Examiner-Apr 9, 2019
Washington Examiner-Apr 9, 2019
William Barr Gives Trump What He Wants, Forms Team to Investigate ...
International-Vanity Fair-Apr 9, 2019
International-Vanity Fair-Apr 9, 2019
Turning the tables: AG Barr has already assembled a 'team' to probe ...
In-Depth-Daily Mail-Apr 9, 2019
In-Depth-Daily Mail-Apr 9, 2019
William Barr is right to investigate FBI actions during 2016 campaign
The Hill-Apr 14, 2019
William Barr is right to investigate FBI actions during 2016 campaign .... The general consensus among Democrats now is that Barr has ...
Trump can still be impeached despite Mueller report summary, former ...
The Independent-Apr 15, 2019
The Independent-Apr 15, 2019
Barr's spy talk emboldens Trump's allies ahead of Mueller report's ...
Opinion-Washington Post-Apr 14, 2019
Opinion-Washington Post-Apr 14, 2019
Barr has questions about the Russia investigation. Here are some ...
CNN-Apr 12, 2019
At two high-stakes hearings on Capitol Hill, Barr said he's worried about potential FBI misconduct at the early stages of the Russia investigation ...
Comey on Barr's 'spying' claim: 'I don't know what the heck he's talking ...
International-<a href="http://NBCNews.com" rel="nofollow">NBCNews.com</a>-Apr 11, 2019
International-<a href="http://NBCNews.com" rel="nofollow">NBCNews.com</a>-Apr 11, 2019
Barr Should Focus on 2 Questions When Investigating Spying on ...
International-Daily Signal-Apr 11, 2019
International-Daily Signal-Apr 11, 2019
Attorney General William Barr is reportedly investigating allegations of ...
Business Insider-Apr 10, 2019
Attorney General William Barr has reportedly put together his own team to look into purported Justice Department and FBI misconduct related to several ...
Citing 'Spying' On Trump, Barr Says He Is Looking Into Origins Of ...
International-NPR-Apr 10, 2019
International-NPR-Apr 10, 2019
The high cost of William Barr's spying allegations
Washington Post-15 hours ago
First, Barr's statements supported a narrative that the FBI and ... were acting improperly and illegally when they investigated links between the ...
Pelosi: Attorney General Barr Believes Trump Is Above The Law
International-RealClearPolitics-9 hours ago
International-RealClearPolitics-9 hours ago
Barr builds team to review FBI's actions during Trump investigation
Axios-Apr 9, 2019
During a House Appropriations Committee hearing Attorney General William Barr said he is assembling a team to investigate ...
GOP senators renew request for more information about FBI Clinton ...
Politico-8 hours ago
... William Barr on Tuesday, Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S. ... Last month, Graham said he would investigate whether the FBI and ...
GOP Senators Really Want To See A 'Highly Classified' FBI Memo ...
International-The Daily Caller-2 hours ago
International-The Daily Caller-2 hours ago
Barr Orders Investigations of Discrimination at FBI and Bureau of Prisons
New York Times-Apr 5, 2019
WASHINGTON — Attorney General William P. Barr has directed parts of the Justice Department to investigate accusations of discrimination, ...
AG Bill Barr Has Ordered Investigations Into Anti-LGBT Discrimination ...
BuzzFeed News-Apr 4, 2019
Attorney General Bill Barr responded on Thursday to a group of LGBT ... of Prisons and the FBI “to take appropriate action to investigate and ...
Mark Meadows: 'Highly likely' FISA abuse investigation spawns more ...
Washington Examiner-Apr 14, 2019
Barr is putting together a team to examine the FBI's initial investigation into President Trump's campaign in the summer of 2016. He testified last ...
Robert Mueller submits Russia report: Investigation into election ...
CBS News-Mar 22, 2019
Barr will now summarize Mueller's report for lawmakers. .... July 2015: The FBI opens investigation into Hillary Clinton's use of private email ...
Special counsel Robert Mueller delivers report marking end of ...
International-USA TODAY-Mar 22, 2019
International-USA TODAY-Mar 22, 2019
Mueller did not find Trump campaign "conspired" with Russia
CBS News-Mar 24, 2019
Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation "did not establish that ... Attorney General William Barrsummarized the report's findings in a letter to .... at the White House in 2017 in which the president reportedly told then-FBI ...
Scarborough: Barr Is Destroying His Legacy With "Spying" Claim ...
RealClearPolitics-Apr 14, 2019
Scarborough: Barr Is Destroying His Legacy With "Spying" Claim, "Everything Was ... on Wednesday, Attorney General Barr said he would investigate the origins of the ... "It's very concerning because the FBI, the Department.
Electronic surveillance isn't spying; it's much more powerful
The Hill-14 hours ago
He made this incredible statement without, according to Barr's summary ... He stated he wasn't launching an investigation of the FBI, per se, but, ...
After Mueller report, Senate moves to investigate the Russia probe ...
USA TODAY-Mar 25, 2019
Y., said Barr's conclusions merely handed the job of investigating Trump ... The FBI fired former agent Peter Strzok, who exchanged anti-Trump ...
The Critical Part of Mueller's Report That Barr Didn't Mention
International-The Atlantic-Mar 26, 2019
International-The Atlantic-Mar 26, 2019
Comey says Barr 'deserves the benefit of the doubt' in review of ...
CNN-Apr 2, 2019
Washington (CNN) Former FBI Director James Comey said Tuesday that ... investigation, but at the same time he questioned Barr's decision on ...
Some on Mueller's Team Say Report Was More Damaging Than Barr ...
New York Times-Apr 3, 2019
Mr. Barr has said he will move quickly to release the nearly 400-page report but ... according to government officials familiar with the investigation. ..... They pointed to the decision by James B. Comey, the former F.B.I. director, ...
Lindsey Graham: All The Rules Have Been Changed to Get Trump ...
RealClearPolitics-Apr 15, 2019
Nothing has changed about Bill Barr since he was attorney general under Bush 41. ... prior to when the FBI and the Department of Justice went to the FISA ... up a counterintelligence investigation against the Trump campaign, ...
Mueller Says No Collusion, Barr Raises a Million Questions
WIRED-Mar 24, 2019
“The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign ... Barr reported that Mueller's team of 19 lawyers, alongside 40 FBI ...
Mueller found that there was no Trump-Russia conspiracy but did not ...
International-Business Insider-Mar 24, 2019
International-Business Insider-Mar 24, 2019
William Barr 'pretty upset' with Clinton emails investigation, Lindsey ...
Washington Examiner-Mar 31, 2019
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Attorney General William Barr is "pretty upset" with how the FBIhandled the investigation into Hillary ...
Lindsey Graham Says AG Barr 'Pretty Upset' Over FBI's Hillary Clinton ...
Highly Cited-The Daily Caller-Apr 1, 2019
Highly Cited-The Daily Caller-Apr 1, 2019
Read the whole story
· · · · · · · · · ·
Paris changed forever: AP reporter describes the emotions of discovering that an iconic part of the city she calls home is in flames.
In the heart of Paris, watching a symbol of France burn
PARIS (AP) — I started running toward the source of the yellow smoke without knowing what it was — only that it was coming from the island in the middle of the Seine at the heart of so much of...
In the heart of Paris, watching a symbol of France burn
PARIS (AP) — I started running toward the source of the yellow smoke without knowing what it was — only that it was coming from the island in the middle of the Seine at the heart of so much of...
FBI controls Facebook and Twitter and many (not all) hosting services. In effect, they control the whole sphere of the Internet, mass media, and social communications; and this is extremely dangerous, it creates the most fertile ground for the dictatorship.
Posted by 
MichaelNovakhov on Tuesday, April 16th, 2019 12:49pm
MichaelNovakhov on Tuesday, April 16th, 2019 12:49pm
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 4
Michael Novakhov on Twitter - 8:14 AM 4/16/2019
Read the whole story
· ·
News, Reviews, Analysis, Opinions
FBI NEWS REVIEW - By Michael Novakhov
Their "hair analysts" gave the wrong testimonies and sent the innocent people to prison simply because they wanted to "make it", to serve and to move up the ladder. Read about it, including my blogs and sites.
They have to be destroyed, abolished, and those who deserve it should be prosecuted themselves. I could not and still cannot believe that all this, including their infamous COINTELPRO "operations" were happening in America!
And in addition to all that, they are simply incompetent and are not able to carry out their duties properly. I think that the FBI is the major threat to the sanity and the mental health of the American people. The FBI "COINTELPRO specialists" literally and deliberately drive you crazy, and those very talanted artistic nincompoops sincerely believe, in accordance with their limited intellectual capacities, that this is exactly their job to do.
They became the inspiring model for the many monstrous "secret security services" around the world, and lately for the Israeli private spying firms who developed and expanded ad criminal absurdum the COINTELPRO tactics and techniques. Read about those firms activities and interference in 2016 Elections.
And you better investigate all of the above! Michael Novakhov - 4:51 AM 4/16/2019
Read the whole story
· ·
3:12 PM 4/15/2019 - Mueller’s Trump-Russia report to be released on Thursday The Guardian: William Barr will release a redacted version of the near 400-page report to Congress and the public, spokeswoman said.
“trump putin” – Google News
| Mueller Report News Review – The Trump Investigations Report – Review Of News And Opinions | ||
|
The Trump Investigations Report – Review Of News And Opinions.
“Mueller Report” – Google News
Read the whole story
· ·
Trump and Trumpism - 3:21 PM 4/15/2019
Read the whole story
· · ·
Mi zinkz zat Booty-booty (my cuti), Bernie, und Harris would make a good menage, if they could only manage, und it lookz like zey will.by noreply@blogger.com (Michael Novakhov (Mike Nova))
DONATE: https://www.gofundme.com/trump-investigations-report | The New Abwehr Hypothesis of The Operation Trump: A Study In Political Psychology, Political Criminology, and Psychohistory, and as the aid for the General, Criminal and the Counterintelligence Investigations of Donald Trump - by Michael Novakhov, M.D. (Mike Nova): Web Research, Analysis, Hypotheses, and Opinions | Current News | Reviews of media reports | Selected reading lists | Site: http://trumpinvestigations.org/
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 5
5:29 AM 4/15/2019 - Bernie Sanders introduces his new 'Medicare for all' plan, and other stories
Michael Novakhov - SharedNewsLinks℠
All Saved Stories - 25
-
Michael Novakhov - SharedNewsLinks℠
All Saved Stories - 25
-
Saved Stories - None  |
|---|
| FoxNewsChannel's YouTube Videos: The Loony Left: Medicare for all |
Read the whole story
· · · ·
NEW YORK/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - As recently as February, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team dropped hints that the inquiry into Russia’s role in the 2016 U.S. election might unearth evidence of active cooperation between Moscow and President Donald Trump’s campaign.
FILE PHOTO: Special Counsel Robert Mueller departs after briefing members of the U.S. Senate on his investigation into potential collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., June 21, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts/File Photo
That turned out not to be the case, according to Attorney General William Barr, who has said he hopes to release Mueller’s nearly 400 page report this week. Barr told U.S. lawmakers on March 24 that the special counsel investigation “did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”
To be sure, the investigation documented numerous contacts between Trump campaign figures and Russia, a willingness on the part of the campaign to accept help from Moscow, and no indication that the campaign told the Kremlin to keep out of an American presidential race.
No criminal conspiracy was documented, according to Barr. But court statements by members of Mueller’s team and evidence disclosed in various prosecutions by the special counsel had suggested on several occasions during the 22-month investigation that they were investigating a possible conspiracy.
Frank Montoya, a former senior FBI official with extensive experience in counterintelligence investigations, said the words “did not establish” are commonly used in national security cases as language merely ruling out a chargeable offense.
“It doesn’t mean a subject is innocent. It means investigators didn’t find enough evidence to charge a crime,” Montoya said.
A recent indication that the special counsel was investigating a Trump-Russia conspiracy came on Feb. 4 during a closed-door court hearing in Washington. Prosecutor Andrew Weissmann said Mueller was still investigating interactions between former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his Russian business partner Konstantin Kilimnik as critical to the inquiry.
“This goes to the larger view of what we think is going on, and what we think the motive here is,” Weissmann said, according to a transcript released days later. “This goes, I think, very much to the heart of what the Special Counsel’s Office is investigating.”
Mueller’s team said Manafort shared political polling data from the campaign with Kilimnik, who the special counsel has said had ties to Russian intelligence. The two also discussed proposals for a Ukrainian client to solve the Crimea conflict in a Kremlin-friendly way, Mueller said.
Three weeks after Weissmann made his comments, Mueller’s office backtracked. It said in a court filing it needed to correct its assertions about Manafort’s interactions with Kilimnik. Partially redacted court filings indicated the correction may relate to the polling data.
When Mueller’s report is released - with parts blacked out by Barr to protect certain sensitive information - it is unclear how harsh a light it will shine on the contacts between Trump campaign figures and Russians. Those making contacts included the president’s son Donald Trump Jr., son-in-law Jared Kushner, former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen and campaign figures Manafort, Jeff Sessions, Michael Flynn and George Papadopoulos.
Mueller and U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded Russia employed hacking and propaganda to sow division in the United States, harm Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton and boost Trump’s candidacy. Moscow has denied election interference.
A key event in the question of conspiracy was a June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower in New York in which Manafort, Kushner and Trump Jr. met with Kremlin-connected lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, who had offered damaging information about Clinton. After being promised “dirt” on Clinton, Trump Jr. wrote in an email, “I love it.”
Alan Futerfas, a lawyer for Trump Jr., declined to comment.
Mueller charged 34 people and three Russian entities. He convicted or secured guilty pleas from Trump aides including Manafort, Flynn, Cohen and Papadopoulos, and charged Russian intelligence officers and a Russian “troll farm.”
Another avenue related to potential conspiracy was Mueller’s pursuit of longtime Trump political adviser Roger Stone, who had suggested he had a relationship with the WikiLeaks website and advance knowledge of its release of Democratic emails the special counsel said were stolen by Russians to hurt Clinton.
But when Mueller indicted Stone in January, the seven criminal counts did not refer to conspiring with Russians and there was no allegation of close ties to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who separately was charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion related to a 2010 hack of U.S. government computers.
Mueller questioned more than a half dozen Stone associates to establish if he had acted as a go-between for the campaign with WikiLeaks. Two Stone associates who spoke to Reuters said Stone had struggled to make contact with Assange rather than having an inside track.
Randy Credico, a New York comedian associated with Stone who appeared before Mueller’s grand jury, is a case in point. Text messages between Stone and Credico seen by Reuters show Stone sought to use the comedian as an intermediary with Assange and urged Credico to feed WikiLeaks anti-Clinton research. Credico told Reuters he never made good on the request.
Stone, who has been ordered by a judge not to talk about the case, is declining comment on the investigation.
Mueller’s investigation was aided by witnesses including Flynn, the former national security adviser who pleaded guilty in December 2017 to lying about his communications with Russian ambassador Sergei Kislyak in 2016, and Samuel Patten, a political consultant and former Kilimnik business partner sentenced to probation on Friday after prosecutors credited him for assisting Mueller and other probes.
It is unclear to what extent Mueller’s inability to secure cooperation from others impeded him.
A spokesman for Mueller declined to comment.
A judge found that Manafort, after agreeing to cooperate, repeatedly lied to prosecutors about interactions with Kilimnik and other matters, breaching a plea deal. Kilimnik, charged along with Manafort with conspiring to tamper with witnesses, was believed to be in Russia, out of reach.
There also are witnesses like Papadopoulos, the first former Trump aide charged by Mueller who initially cooperated but became increasingly critical of the special counsel, especially after completing a two-week prison term in December.
Reporting by Nathan Layne and Mark Hosenball; Editing by Will Dunham and Daniel Wallis
Read the whole story
· · · · ·
3:37 AM 4/15/2019 - How Mueller's hunt for a Russia-Trump conspiracy came up short - Reuters | Ricardo Rossello: "Helpful to have another presidential candidate raising awareness of #PuertoRico's lack of political representation. Thank you, @PeteButtigieg! We need to end 2nd class citizenship immediately and respect the will of the people who have twice voted for #equality through #statehood"
Ricardo Rossello:
______________________________________________
How Mueller's hunt for a Russia-Trump conspiracy came up short Reuters
As recently as February, Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team dropped hints that the inquiry into Russia's role in the 2016 U.S. election might unearth ...
Pete Buttigieg (pronounced BOOT-edge-edge). Photo: Bobby Doherty for New York Magazine
By the time Pete Buttigieg arrived at the Currier Museum of Art in Manchester, New Hampshire, on the night of April 5, the space was at capacity and the crowd had swelled to fill half the parking lot. It was drizzling, but word quickly spread that Buttigieg would speak before heading inside, so those denied admission stayed put, preparing to lift up their phones to document this moment in the twilight, when the suddenly famous mayor of a small city in a state they’d probably only ever visit by accident or under force would make the case for his campaign to be the savior who delivers America from President Donald Trump.
The mayor of South Bend, Indiana (pop. 102,245), for the past eight years and a candidate in the 2020 Democratic primary (pop. 18 and expanding) since January, Buttigieg is in the middle of what the mainstream media likes to call “a moment,” that dreamy season between obscurity and overexposure when all anyone asks is “Who is Pete Buttigieg?” or “How do you pronounce Buttigieg?” or “Should I care about Pete Buttigieg?” Which is mostly a way of asking, “Is this for real?”
Read the whole story
· · · ·
How Mueller's hunt for a Russia-Trump conspiracy came up short Reuters
As recently as February, Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team dropped hints that the inquiry into Russia's role in the 2016 U.S. election might unearth ...
Comments
Post a Comment