M.N.: The U.S. - Germany Diplomatic Meltdown: The German politicians' tone, the Merkel's ridiculous, clearly hypocritical, grandiose pronouncements and the pretenses to become the center of the World leadership in human rights and other areas, and the open hostility to America " had long been inappropriate to relations between close allies", and more than that: this tone and actions are dangerous to the present Global Security arrangements and structures. - 3:48 AM 3/20/2019
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
M.N.: The German politicians' tone, the Merkel's ridiculous, clearly hypocritical, grandiose pronouncements and the pretenses to become the center of the World leadership in human rights and other areas, and the open hostility to America " had long been inappropriate to relations between close allies", and more than that: this tone and actions are dangerous to the present Global Security arrangements and structures. Put the nationalistic, passive-aggressive, filled with the historical rage, revanchist Germany firmly in her place, until it is too late, and until this situation leads to the next historical catastrophe.
I think that the "Trump Affair" was manufactured and designed by the German Intelligence Services, and very possibly by the resurgent New Abwehr; and this affair was implemented by their witting, half-witting, or unwitting proxies: Russian-Israeli Jewish Oligarchs and the Global Mafia, of which the today's Russian State became a part of, as the "Mafia State". This hypothesis has to investigated and explored very thoroughly.
My advice: Do freeze the "U.S. intelligence sharing with Berlin". It will be the logical recognition of the current circumstances and situation, and it will do more good than bad.
Germany is not the U.S. real ally. It is the "make believe ally", and it should be treated as such.
Michael Novakhov
3:48 AM 3/20/2019
A summary of this post was emailed to the German Bundestag.
-
"Grenell's tone had long been inappropriate to relations between close allies, Schneider said, charging the ambassador with failure to recognize Germany's contribution within the alliance, in Afghanistan for example.
"Mr Grenell is harming transatlantic relations with his repeated heavy-handed remarks," he said."
...
"The envoy last week warned German Economy Minister Peter Altmaier in a letter that security concerns could throttle U.S. intelligence sharing with Berlin if Huawei got a role in Germany's 5G next-generation mobile infrastructure."
-
...
"The envoy last week warned German Economy Minister Peter Altmaier in a letter that security concerns could throttle U.S. intelligence sharing with Berlin if Huawei got a role in Germany's 5G next-generation mobile infrastructure."
-
U.S. President Donald Trump's combative envoy to Germany, Richard Grenell continues to draw fire from German officials for trying to intervene in the country's affairs.
"Mr Grenell is a total diplomatic failure," Carsten Schneider, head of the Social Democratic Party (SPD)' s parliamentary caucus, told the dpa in Berlin after ambassador Grenell criticized Berlin's decision to move more slowly toward the NATO spending target of 2 percent of gross domestic product.
Grenell's tone had long been inappropriate to relations between close allies, Schneider said, charging the ambassador with failure to recognize Germany's contribution within the alliance, in Afghanistan for example.
"Mr Grenell is harming transatlantic relations with his repeated heavy-handed remarks," he said.
Grenell has also faced criticism for his handling of U.S.-German disagreements over trade, a 2015 Iran nuclear deal and the Russian-led Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline.
The envoy last week warned German Economy Minister Peter Altmaier in a letter that security concerns could throttle U.S. intelligence sharing with Berlin if Huawei got a role in Germany's 5G next-generation mobile infrastructure.
Merkel told reporters the German government was keenly focused on security of digital networks, including the 5G mobile infrastructure, but Berlin would keep its own counsel.
Michael Grosse-Broemer, a conservative leader in parliament, said Germany was competent to address its own security, adding, "There is no need for pointers from the U.S. ambassador."
Grenell also sparked controversy in Germany when he warned German firms to start closing down their business operations in Iran.
His threat to slap sanctions on German firms involved in the Nord Stream 2 pipeline also proved counterproductive, shutting down potential critics of the project as German politicians are reluctant to be seen as bowing to U.S. pressure, experts said.
"Political smoothness is not his thing and he's proud of that. You could say he was the most undiplomatic diplomat Washington ever had here," said Ruediger Lentz, executive director the Aspen Institute Germany.
-
M.N.: Who is blackmailing whom, Mr. Schroeder? | "Former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder expressed "outrage", according to media reports," accusing the US envoy of "brazen blackmail." | US ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell receives threats | The neo-Nazi plot against America is much bigger than we realize - 5:30 AM 3/15/2019
M.N.: Who is blackmailing whom, Mr. Schroeder?
-
Quote:
"Grenell most recently sent a letter to the German government last week threatening to curtail its access to US intelligence if Berlin decides to issue contracts to Chinese telecom giant Huawei for its 5G network, according to a US official familiar with the matter.
Former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder expressed outrage, according to media reports, accusing the US envoy of "brazen blackmail."
>> Mike Nova’s Shared NewsLinks Review In Brief
» US ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell receives threats
15/03/19 05:20 from Mike Nova's Shared Newslinks
Michael_Novakhov shared this story . A photo of one letter seen by CNN which was sent directly to Richard Grenell in January told him to leave Germany or he would be killed. Signed by the "Society for the New Truth," it was one of severa...
15/03/19 05:20 from Mike Nova's Shared Newslinks
Michael_Novakhov shared this story . A photo of one letter seen by CNN which was sent directly to Richard Grenell in January told him to leave Germany or he would be killed. Signed by the "Society for the New Truth," it was one of severa...
» The neo-Nazi plot against America is much bigger than we realize - Google Search
15/03/19 04:42 from Mike Nova's Shared Newslinks
Michael_Novakhov shared this story .
15/03/19 04:42 from Mike Nova's Shared Newslinks
Michael_Novakhov shared this story .
» The neo-Nazi plot against America is much bigger than we realize - Google Search
15/03/19 04:41 from Mike Nova's Shared Newslinks
Michael_Novakhov shared this story .
15/03/19 04:41 from Mike Nova's Shared Newslinks
Michael_Novakhov shared this story .
CLOSE
According to a new USA TODAY/Suffolk University poll, Americans' trust in Robert Mueller's investigation is decreasing. USA TODAY
WASHINGTON – Amid signs that special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian election interference may be near its conclusion, a new USA TODAY/Suffolk University Poll finds that trust in Mueller has eroded and half of Americans agree with President Donald Trump's contention that he has been the victim of a "witch hunt."
Support for the House of Representatives to seriously consider impeaching the president has dropped since last October by 10 percentage points, to 28 percent.
Despite that, the survey shows a nation that remains skeptical of Trump's honesty and deeply divided by his leadership. A 52 percent majority say they have little or no trust in the president's denials that his 2016 campaign colluded with Moscow in the election that put him in the Oval Office.
That number does reflect an improvement from previous polls. One year ago, 57 percent had little or no trust in his denials; in December, 59 percent did.
Twenty-eight percent say they have a lot of trust in former FBI director Mueller's investigation to be fair and accurate. That's the lowest level to date and down 5 points since December.
In comparison, 30 percent express a lot of trust in Trump's denials, the highest to date.
President Donald Trump has been relentless in attacking Robert Mueller's investigation. (Photo: Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images)
Mueller indicted 34 people, including Russian intelligence operatives and some of Trump's closest aides and advisers. The indictments detailed the eagerness of the Trump campaign to benefit from a sophisticated Russian effort to influence the 2016 election but have not accused the president’s aides of participating in that operation. Last week, Trump's former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, was sentenced to a total of 7.5 years in federal prison for financial crimes.
The poll's findings set the stage for a ferocious partisan battle when Mueller submits his report to Attorney General William Barr. The president's cascade of criticism of those pursuing him has fortified his support and raised questions about his investigators.
Trump tweets about Mueller
That campaign continued this weekend.
"What the Democrats have done in trying to steal a Presidential Election, first at the 'ballot box' and then, after that failed, with the 'Insurance Policy,' is the biggest Scandal in the history of our Country!" Trump declared in a tweet Sunday night.
Friday, Trump tweeted that "there should be no" report from Mueller, who was appointed in May 2017 to investigate how Moscow tried to influence the presidential election and whether Team Trump cooperated.
"This was an illegal & conflicted investigation in search of a crime," Trump wrote Sunday, adding in a follow-up tweet, "THIS SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN TO A PRESIDENT AGAIN!"
Fifty percent say they agree with Trump's assertion that the special counsel's investigation is a "witch hunt" and that he has been subjected to more investigations than previous presidents because of politics; 47 percent disagree. Just 3 percent don't have an opinion.
There is, unsurprisingly, a stark partisan divide on that question: 86 percent of Republicans but just 14 percent of Democrats say Trump is the victim of a "witch hunt." Among independents, 54 percent say he is; 42 percent say he isn't.
The president's success in persuading half of the electorate that he’s been subjected to unprecedented scrutiny is notable, says David Paleologos, director of the Suffolk Political Research Center.
"Even among people who said they had ‘some’ trust in the Mueller investigation, half agreed with President Trump's witch hunt allegation,” he says.
President Donald Trump hugs the American flag as he arrives to speak at Conservative Political Action Conference, CPAC 2019, in Oxon Hill, Md., Saturday, March 2, 2019. Carolyn Kaster, AP
7 Photos
President Donald Trump speaks at CPAC 2019
President Donald Trump arrives to speak at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Md., on March 2, 2019. Nicholas Kamm, AFP/Getty Images
Supporters cheer for U.S. President Donald Trump during CPAC 2019 on March 02, 2019 National Harbor, Md. The American Conservative Union hosts the annual Conservative Political Action Conference to discuss conservative agenda. Tasos Katopodis, Getty Images
President Donald J. Trump speaks at the 46th annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center in National Harbor, Md., on March 2, 2019. Trump spoke on the final day of the four-day American Conservative Union's CPAC conference. Erik S. Lesser, EPA-EFE
President Donald J. Trump speaks at the 46th annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center in National Harbor, Md., on March 2, 2019. Trump spoke on the final day of the four-day American Conservative Union's CPAC conference. Erik S. Lesser, EPA-EFE
President Donald Trump speaks during the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Md., on March 2, 2019. Nicholas Kamm, AFP/Getty Images
President Donald Trump speaks during the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Md., on March 2, 2019. Nicholas Kamm, AFP/Getty Images
1 of 8
Autoplay
Show Thumbnails
Show Captions
"Trump, he gets badgered every single day," says Robert Lynch, 62, of Selden, New York, a Republican who describes himself as a "100 percent" supporter of the president. Mueller's report is "going to say no collusion, absolutely none," he predicts.
Annette Lantos Tillemann-Dick, 66, an innkeeper from Denver and a Democrat, disagrees, saying evidence of collusion by Trump's campaign is obvious: "You don't need a report to see it. It's in our face."
Lynch and Tillemann-Dick were among those surveyed. The poll of 1,000 registered voters, taken by landline and cellphone Wednesday through Sunday, has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
"I hope that illegal collusion makes it very difficult for the Republicans to continue to defend undefendable behavior on the part of the person who is sitting in the chief executive's office," Tillemann-Dick says. "And I hope that it would lead to him being removed from office." (Tillemann-Dick, who was called randomly in the survey, happens to be the daughter of the late congressman Tom Lantos, D-Calif.)
A shift on impeachment
Support for impeaching Trump has cooled, the poll shows, in the wake of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's declaration that she opposed the idea unless there was bipartisan support for it. Among Democrats, 41 percent say Pelosi's comments had some or a lot of impact on their opinion about impeachment, about equal to the 42 percent who say they had no impact.
Pelosi's argument that trying to remove Trump from office would divide the nation apparently flipped the public's expectations of what Congress will do. Last fall, the poll found that a 54 percent-32 percent majority said a new Democratic majority in the House was likely to seriously consider impeachment.
Now, by 46 percent-41 percent, those surveyed predict that the House won't.
"If he doesn't get impeached, it's not like it's going to be the end of the world because 2020 is not super-far away," says Calvin Crawford, 18, a political independent and a senior at University High School in Spokane, Washington, who was polled. "I think Trump is probably going to lose if a candidate comes out and starts to propose things that people actually want."
Overall, Americans by 62 percent-28 percent say the House shouldn't seriously consider impeaching Trump, compared with 54 percent-39 percent last October. While a 53 percent majority of Democrats support impeachment, just 6 percent of Republicans do.
Gloria Davy, 65, a Democrat from Tucson, says it would bring her "great joy" for Democrats to push for impeachment, but she worries about the upheaval that could follow.
"I can't imagine what would happen to the stock market," the Arizona retiree says. "So it's probably best not to impeach him and to just have him run for his second term and lose. That would be the safest thing for our economy."
She is eager to see Mueller's report. "I'll read it cover to cover," she says.
Release the report?
As Mueller's inquiry winds down, the debate over what to do about the confidential report he is required to submit to the Justice Department is heating up. Last Thursday, the House unanimously passed a resolution calling for public release of the report, but Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., blocked passage of the nonbinding measure in the Senate.
The poll found overwhelming and bipartisan support for releasing the report, whatever it finds. In all, 82 percent say it is important to them that the report be made public; 62 percent call that "very important."
Mueller leaves after briefing members of the Senate Judiciary Committee on the investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election on Capitol Hill on June 21, 2017. Michael Reynolds, European Pressphoto Agency
22 Photos
A look at former FBI director Robert Mueller
Mueller departs after a closed-door meeting with members of the Senate Judiciary Committee on June 21, 2017. J. Scott Applewhite, AP
Mueller arrives for a court hearing at the Phillip Burton Federal Building in San Francisco on April 21, 2016. He had been overseeing settlement talks with Volkswagen, the U.S. government and private lawyers for the automaker to buy back some of the nearly 600,000 diesel cars that cheat on emissions tests. Jeff Chiu, AP
James Comey talks with Mueller before he was officially sworn in as FBI director on Sept. 4, 2013.Susan Walsh, AP
Mueller jokes with CIA Director John Brennan during his farewell ceremony at the Department of Justice on Aug. 1, 2013, in Washington. Evan Vucci, AP
President Barack Obama, followed by Mueller, right, and his choice for Mueller's successor, Comey, left, walks toward the podium in the Rose Garden on June 21, 2013. Pablo Martinez Monsivais, AP
Mueller testifies during a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on June 19, 2013, where he confirmed that the FBI uses drones for domestic surveillance. Alex Wong, Getty Images
Mueller is sworn in on Capitol Hill on June 13, 2013, prior to testifying before the House Judiciary Committee. J. Scott Applewhite, AP
Mueller and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper listen to statements at a Senate Intelligence Committee open hearing on worldwide threats on Jan. 31, 2012. H. Darr Beiser, USA TODAY
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, Mueller and National Counterterrorism Center Director Matthew Olsen testify on Capitol Hill on Sept. 13, 2011, before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on the terror threat to the U.S. Evan Vucci, AP
Clapper speaks with Mueller during the launch of the strategy to combat transnational organized crime at the White House on July 25, 2011. Nicholas Kamm, AFP/Getty Images
Mueller speaks at a conference on domestic terrorism on Oct. 6, 2010. Jacquelyn Martin, AP
Obama speaks with Mueller during a meeting at FBI headquarters in Washington on April 28, 2009.Saul Loeb, AFP/Getty Images
Mueller is welcomed on Capitol Hill on March 25, 2009, by Sen. Arlen Specter, ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, prior to testifying before the committee's oversight hearing regarding the FBI. J. Scott Applewhite, AP
Mueller and Sen. Patrick Leahy chat ahead of Mueller's testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Sept. 17, 2008, on Capitol Hill. Mandel Ngan, AFP/Getty Images
Mueller testifies on Capitol Hill on Feb. 5, 2008, before the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on world threats. Kevin Wolf, AP
Mueller prepares to testify on Capitol Hill on March 27, 2007, before the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the FBI. Susan Walsh, AP
Mueller answers questions from the media in Charlotte, N.C., on April 24, 2006. Chuck Burton, AP
CIA Director Porter Goss, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and Mueller testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee on April 27, 2005. Tim Dillon, USA TODAY
Mueller and Attorney General John Ashcroft exit a press briefing at the Department of Justice on Oct. 29, 2001. Stephen Jaffe, AFP
Mueller is sworn in at the start of his testimony during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill on July 30, 2001. Dennis Cook, AP
President George W. Bush names Mueller the new director of the FBI at a Rose Garden ceremony on July 5, 2001. Mike Theiler, AFP
1 of 23
Autoplay
Show Thumbnails
Show Captions
Assessments of Mueller have become less positive and more partisan during his investigation. In June 2017, before he had brought any indictments or won any convictions, 30 percent viewed him favorably and 16 percent unfavorably, a net positive rating of 14 points. Twenty percent had never heard of him, and 33 percent weren't sure what they thought.
In the new poll, 33 percent view him favorably and 31 percent unfavorably. That net positive rating of 2 points is his narrowest to date. As recently as last October, he had a net positive rating of 17 points, 42 percent-25 percent.
Few Americans expect the conclusion of the special counsel's investigation is going to settle the controversies surrounding the president.
House committees controlled by Democrats launched a series of inquiries into Trump, his administration, his business practices and his family. Views of those investigations are narrowly divided: 49 percent say Democrats are doing the right thing by pursuing the investigations aggressively; 46 percent say they are going too far.
"Now we're going after Ivanka, so there will be more and more and more," said Davy, the Democrat from Arizona, "and he can't veto it."
Lynch, the avid Trump supporter from Long Island, says Mueller's report will clear Trump and should recommend another investigation to follow into his 2016 opponent. "It should say, 'OK, now we're going after Hillary.' "
Dig Deeper
You may also be interested in
Read or Share this story: <a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/03/18/trust-mueller-investigation-falls-half-americans-say-trump-victim-witch-hunt/3194049002/" rel="nofollow">https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/03/18/trust-mueller-investigation-falls-half-americans-say-trump-victim-witch-hunt/3194049002/</a>
Read the whole story
· · · · · · · · · · · ·
Read the whole story
· ·
- New Mueller probe revelations explain Trump's rage CNN
- Trump Cornered The American Prospect
- Schiff: Real question is if Trump is under the influence of a foreign power NBC News
- Mueller news: Trump boasts about poorly framed question in outlier poll Vox.com
- Poll: Half of Americans say Trump is victim of a 'witch hunt' as trust in Mueller erodes USA TODAY
- View full coverage on Google News
But such disclosures are almost never good news for Trump.
The vast breadth of the investigation by various jurisdictions also could offer a rich seam for Democratic House chairmen should they eventually subpoena primary evidence uncovered by Mueller and other prosecutors.
And the release underlines that various investigations that are penetrating deep into Trump's business, personal and political life are likely to be haunting the President for years to come -- even after Mueller has left the stage.
Campaign finance case still alive
The pages of warrants make clear that the investigation into whether the Trump Organization is implicated in the campaign finance case involving his hush money payments to women before the 2016 election is still open.
Eighteen-and-a-half blacked-out pages at the end of one document under the title "The Illegal Campaign Contribution Scheme" almost certainly contain details of Trump's interactions with Cohen.
That prosecutors from the Southern District of New York believe those elements need to be kept out of the public eye suggests that their investigations -- which have already indirectly implicated Trump -- are not over.
"They are not done. We have seen this in filings over and over again," Preet Bharara, a former US attorney for the Southern District of New York, told CNN's Jake Tapper.
So Trump cannot yet be sure whether his family members or top business associates in his firm could face criminal jeopardy.
For the President, who seeks to exert dominance over every room, situation or relationship, the lack of control over the fate of his own clan and the business that bears his name as prosecutors bear down must be close to intolerable.
Some legal observers see the work of the Southern District as Trump's most perilous legal front, even more so than Mueller's look at whether there was coordination between Trump campaign aides and Russia and whether the President obstructed justice to cover it up.
While a sitting President cannot be indicted, according to current Justice Department guidance, Trump cannot be certain that he will not be prosecuted for campaign finance violations when he eventually leaves office.
"If I was Donald Trump, I would be scared," Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu of California, who sits on the House Judiciary Committee, said on CNN's "The Situation Room."
The fact that prosecutors have already endorsed Cohen's statement that he made the payments in violation of campaign finance laws at the direction of Trump means "there may be another shoe to drop," said Bharara.
"There may be other people who are assisting or who are conspiring, up to and including the President, and they haven't decided how they want to proceed on that," he added.
More Russia links
Tuesday's documents also contain more evidence that Trump associates, in this case Cohen, appeared to have at least indirect connections to powerful Russians.
They show that Cohen was paid more than $500,000 through his company as a business consultant from January to August 2017 by Columbus Nova LLC., an investment management firm that is linked to Russian national Viktor Vekselberg.
Vekselberg is an oligarch -- with ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin -- who is under US sanctions regarding election interference.
Columbus Nova said in a statement that neither Vekselberg nor anyone outside the firm had been involved in the decision to hire Cohen or to provide funding for his work.
Cohen, who will go to jail in May after he admitted lying to Congress and for tax and fraud offenses, was not charged with unlawfully acting as an unregistered foreign lobbyist. But he is far from the only Trump associate to have suggestions of links that can be traced back to prominent Russians. Many of those Trump allies have been caught by Mueller trying to hide such relationships.
The question of whether foreign influence and quid pro quos were in play during the Trump campaign for the presidency, and early in his administration, gets to the heart of what Mueller is charged with investigating.
Feeding the 'witch hunt' narrative
Methods used by investigators to track Cohen, including state-of-the-art techniques targeting Apple devices, and the revelation of their sweep through the lawyer's emails and telephone communications may fuel Trump's fury about what he sees as the special counsel's "witch hunt."
They also suggest that Mueller and his counterparts in New York may know a lot about the communications of people around Trump during parts of the 2016 campaign and early in the presidency.
The documents show that Mueller had shown probable cause that Cohen had committed a crime to obtain warrants for two email accounts as far back as the summer of 2017, nine months before FBI agents acting on behalf of New York prosecutors raided Cohen's office and residences.
Trump's siege mentality is unlikely to be helped by the simultaneous publication Tuesday of a double page spread in his hometown newspaper,
The New York Times
, revealing his complicated financial relationship with Deutsche Bank.
Given the avalanche of revelations, it's not surprising that the President is sometimes prone to isolated outbursts of fury directed at Mueller.
"THIS SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN TO A PRESIDENT AGAIN!" Trump tweeted out of the blue on Saturday.
Tuesday's revelations also provided the context against which the President stood in the White House Rose Garden and claimed the real "collusion" in US politics was between social media companies opposed to conservatives.
"It seems to be if they're conservative, if they're Republicans, if they're in a certain group, there's discrimination, and big discrimination," Trump added.
It's also notable that Mueller has indicted three Russian entities and 13 Russian nationals in connection with Moscow's operation to use social media to interfere in the 2016 election, sow political discord and elect Trump.
New intrigue over Rosenstein
Washington has been on edge for several weeks over expectations that Mueller is getting toward the end of the road.
But there was a new wrinkle on Tuesday with the news that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who has overseen much of the Mueller probe, is not yet ready to leave his job.
Rosenstein had been expected to leave in mid-March, now that a new attorney general, William Barr, who is not recused from the Russia probe like his predecessor Jeff Sessions, has taken office.
Rosenstein sees himself as the "heat shield" since he appointed Mueller, and could be in position to take the "hit" if controversy explodes when the report drops, the source said.
Slow-rolling Trump's defense
While Trump may feel increasingly isolated, there are new indications that Democrats who have launched their own vast investigation against Trump world will encounter significant difficulties.
Some former officials who received letters from the committee requesting documents, including former White House counsel Don McGahn and former deputy counsel Annie Donaldson, are referring them to the White House.
Republican aides said the committee had gotten responses from only eight of the 81 officials who had received letters from the committee earlier this month, and a ninth had mailed documents, though they had yet to be received.
Democrats painted a more positive picture, but the speed bumps were a sign of the tortuous road of subpoenas and legal challenges ahead as House Democrats face White House resistance.
People outside the government, however, are more exposed to subpoenas than others in the administration, as they cannot wage long fights citing executive privilege concerns as an excuse not to hand over documents.
CNN's Kevin Collier, Marshall Cohen, Erica Orden, Pamela Brown, Sara Murray, Jeremy Herb, Manu Raju, Katelyn Polantz and Kara Scannell contributed to this report.
Read the whole story
· · · · · · · ·
A new book, though, portrays Mr Trump's daughter and son-in-law, Ivanka and Jared Kushner, as a power-hungry couple, concerned primarily with ...
Breaking News Emails
Get breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.
By Ken Dilanian
WASHINGTON — Nearly two years into his investigation, special counsel Robert Mueller has not accused any member of the Trump campaign of conspiring with the 2016 election interference effort — and it's not clear whether he will.
But legal experts, along with the congressman leading the House Russia investigation, tell NBC News that the most important question investigators must answer is one that may never have been suitable for the criminal courts: Whether President Trump or anyone around him is under the influence of a foreign government.
"It's more important to know what Trump is NOW than to know what he did in 2016," said Martin Lederman, professor at the Georgetown University Law Center and former deputy assistant attorney general in the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel during the Obama administration. "It's more important to know whether he has been compromised as president than whether his conduct during the campaign constituted a crime."
Whether Mueller will answer that question in the absence of criminal charges is unclear. But in an interview with NBC News, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff said he is steering his investigation in a new direction to focus on it — and he will demand any relevant evidence compiled by the FBI or Mueller's team.
The California Democrat also expressed concern that Mueller hasn't fully investigated Trump's possible financial history with Russia.
"From what we can see either publicly or otherwise, it's very much an open question whether this is something the special counsel has looked at," Schiff told NBC News.
Schiff said the public testimony from former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen that in 2016 Trump stood to earn hundreds of millions of dollars from a secret Moscow real estate project is a staggering conflict of interest that must be fully explored.
"I certainly agree that the counterintelligence investigation may be more important than the criminal investigation because it goes to a present threat to our national security — whether the president and anybody around him are compromised by a foreign power," Schiff said. "That's not necessarily an issue that can be covered in indictments."
In fact, most FBI counterintelligence investigations don't result in criminal charges, experts say, because they tend to involve secret intelligence that either can't be used in court or doesn't add up to proof beyond a reasonable doubt. If the FBI assesses that a government official is compromised by a foreign adversary, officials often will quietly remove that person from a sensitive role or wall him or her off from classified information.
Obviously, none of that is an option for the president of the United States.
Read the whole story
· · · · ·
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 2
A new book, though, portrays Mr Trump's daughter and son-in-law, Ivanka and Jared Kushner, as a power-hungry couple, concerned primarily with ...
Breaking News Emails
Get breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.
By Ken Dilanian
WASHINGTON — Nearly two years into his investigation, special counsel Robert Mueller has not accused any member of the Trump campaign of conspiring with the 2016 election interference effort — and it's not clear whether he will.
But legal experts, along with the congressman leading the House Russia investigation, tell NBC News that the most important question investigators must answer is one that may never have been suitable for the criminal courts: Whether President Trump or anyone around him is under the influence of a foreign government.
"It's more important to know what Trump is NOW than to know what he did in 2016," said Martin Lederman, professor at the Georgetown University Law Center and former deputy assistant attorney general in the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel during the Obama administration. "It's more important to know whether he has been compromised as president than whether his conduct during the campaign constituted a crime."
Whether Mueller will answer that question in the absence of criminal charges is unclear. But in an interview with NBC News, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff said he is steering his investigation in a new direction to focus on it — and he will demand any relevant evidence compiled by the FBI or Mueller's team.
The California Democrat also expressed concern that Mueller hasn't fully investigated Trump's possible financial history with Russia.
"From what we can see either publicly or otherwise, it's very much an open question whether this is something the special counsel has looked at," Schiff told NBC News.
Schiff said the public testimony from former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen that in 2016 Trump stood to earn hundreds of millions of dollars from a secret Moscow real estate project is a staggering conflict of interest that must be fully explored.
"I certainly agree that the counterintelligence investigation may be more important than the criminal investigation because it goes to a present threat to our national security — whether the president and anybody around him are compromised by a foreign power," Schiff said. "That's not necessarily an issue that can be covered in indictments."
In fact, most FBI counterintelligence investigations don't result in criminal charges, experts say, because they tend to involve secret intelligence that either can't be used in court or doesn't add up to proof beyond a reasonable doubt. If the FBI assesses that a government official is compromised by a foreign adversary, officials often will quietly remove that person from a sensitive role or wall him or her off from classified information.
Obviously, none of that is an option for the president of the United States.
No official action was taken after Trump was accused of giving highly classified information to the Russian foreign minister in the Oval Office in 2017. As the president, he has the legal right to spill secrets to whomever he wants.
The White House has long insisted that the notion of a president in thrall to the Kremlin is ridiculous, pointing to the sanctions the Trump administration has levied on Russia in response to cyber attacks, election interference, and its actions in Ukraine.
Trump defenders complain that those who are now focusing on foreign influence have "moved the goalposts" — shifting emphasis to the issue of foreign compromise now that criminal charges involving "Russian collusion" seem less likely.
Trump has criticized Schiff’s approach, saying in a Feb. 7 tweet, "So now Congressman Adam Schiff announces, after having found zero Russian Collusion, that he is going to be looking at every aspect of my life, both financial and personal, even though there is no reason to be doing so. Never happened before! Unlimited Presidential Harassment."
But the question of Trump's motives regarding Russia has always been front and center for the FBI, as former Acting Director Andrew McCabe made clear in a recent round of media appearances. Neither Trump nor any of his supporters has been able to quell questions about the president's embrace of Russian President Vladimir Putin, including Trump's seeming unwillingness to criticize the Russian autocrat.
McCabe, who was fired for lack of candor in an unrelated matter, alleged that the president disputed intelligence that a North Korean missile could hit the United States, saying, "I don't care. I believe Putin."
That allegedly happened behind closed doors, but few will forget the public spectacle of Trump siding with Putin over his intelligence community on the question of U.S. election interference at last year's Helsinki summit, telling the world: "President Putin says it's not Russia. I don't see any reason why it would be."
McCabe said he could not rule out that the president was, in essence, a Russian asset. Trump has called McCabe a liar and "a disgrace to the FBI."
"What Americans should be concerned about is whether the president's Russia policy is not dictated by our national interest but is dictated by his desire to make hundreds of millions of dollars off a tower in Moscow," Schiff said.
In the beginning, a counterspy probe
The FBI's Russia investigation began in July 2016 as a counterintelligence investigation into Trump campaign aides. Current and former officials say the case involved agents whose expertise is counterspy cases and agents who worked criminal matters.
After Mueller took over the investigation and began filing criminal charges, the public and the news media came to view the probe largely through the lens of the criminal justice system. But the counterintelligence dimension never diminished.
The FBI was looking for crimes, but was also using intelligence tools to ferret out and thwart Russia's efforts to interfere in American democracy. And it was collecting intelligence that the government would likely never want to use in court, current and former officials tell NBC News.
In May 2017, Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, told NBC News anchor Lester Holt he did so with Russia on his mind, and told the Russian foreign minister the firing had relieved "great pressure" on him. That led the FBI to open a counterintelligence investigation into the president specifically, according to McCabe. It was married to a criminal investigation examining possible conspiracy with Russian election interference and possible obstruction of justice, McCabe said.
After Mueller in July 2018 accused Russian intelligence officers who hacked the Democrats of conspiring against the United States, many expected that he eventually might charge members of the Trump campaign with participating in that conspiracy.
That hasn't happened. To the contrary, some of the key figures seen as likely participants in any Russia conspiracy — Mike Flynn, Paul Manafort, Rick Gates, Michael Cohen — have been charged with other offenses in cases that made no allegation of any "collusion" with Russia. Two of them, Manafort and Cohen, have been sentenced.
But just because they haven't been charged criminally doesn't mean there isn't evidence they were influenced by Russia, said Frank Figliuzzi, the former top counterintelligence official at the FBI and an NBC News contributor.
"I cringe when I see people trying to apply criminal metrics to a counterintelligence case," he said.
More often than not in counterintelligence cases, Figliuzzi said, the FBI makes a determination that a person has been subject to foreign influence without pursuing criminal charges. For example, he said, if the bureau finds that a top general has developed an inappropriate relationship with a Chinese intelligence asset, that general likely wouldn't be charged with espionage or other crimes. But he almost certainly would be fired.
In Trump's case, longtime students of his real estate career have raised questions about how he generated large amounts of cash in recent years to make big purchases of golf courses and other assets, and of why the German bank Deutsche Bank — which has been fined for laundering Russian money — made loans to him when, by all accounts, no other bank would. There is no public evidence linking Trump’s relationship to Deutsche Bank with the allegations of laundering money for wealthy Russians.
According to the Washington Post, the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section is investigating how Saudi Arabia and other countries sought to influence the Trump Administration through relationships with a key fundraiser, Elliott Broidy. Through a spokesman, Broidy has not denied working with those countries, but he denies any wrongdoing.
It has long been presumed that Mueller would investigate these questions, to determine the extent of Trump's financial history with Russia or other foreign entities that now have a stake in his policy decisions. Trump is the only president in recent history not to have released his tax returns, and the only one to retain a stake in a business empire.
How far did Mueller go?
But Schiff told NBC News he is not convinced that Mueller's Russia investigation — tasked with examining whether there was any coordination between the Trump campaign and Russian election interference — delved deeply into Trump's personal finances.
"The concern I've had in terms of the scope of the Mueller investigation is that the president has tried to draw a red line around certain aspects of his finances," Schiff said. "That's not a line that can be observed and still protect the country."
The special counsel’s office declined to comment.
Schiff noted that the New York Times reported that Trump demanded that Mueller be fired in December 2017 after news reports suggested the special counsel had sent a subpoena to Deutsche Bank. After Trump's lawyers were assured by Mueller's office that the reports were not accurate, the president backed down, according to the Times. The president has called reports he sought to fire Mueller "fake news."
But if Mueller hasn't looked at Trump's relationship the German bank, Schiff said, "they have not done a diligent investigation of money laundering."
He added: "If the president has been successful in chilling the DOJ from looking at his finances, then the Congress needs to do it… Any way in which this president or those around him might be compromised by a foreign hostile power is front and center in our probe."
David Kris, a former Justice Department national security lawyer and founder of Culper Partners consulting firm, worked closely with Mueller when he was FBI director, and knows him well. He told NBC News he believes that Mueller would have taken whatever steps necessary to examine the question of whether Trump had an improper financial relationship with Russia or Russian oligarchs.
"I would trust Mueller to be competently thorough," he said.
It's possible, however, that Mueller didn't believe his mandate allowed him to rummage through Trump's financial history, he added.
Either way, Kris said, Schiff and Congress are on solid legal footing in expecting that Mueller and the FBI will brief them on the results of the counterintelligence investigation into the president — regardless of what criminal charges Mueller files or what he puts in his report.
Leaving aside the special counsel regulations, the executive branch is required by law to keep the House and Senate intelligence committees "fully and currently informed" on important intelligence matters, Kris noted. There is also a requirement that the Justice Department tell Congress about any instances in which a prosecution was halted over concerns about intelligence sources and methods.
Figliuzzi said he frequently briefed Congress on major counterintelligence cases as FBI counterspy chief. He said it's essential that Mueller tell the Congress what, if anything, he has found pointing to possible Russian or other foreign influence on anyone in the Trump administration.
"This is an independent reporting obligation that the intelligence community has," Schiff said. "I do think that the special counsel regulations certainly permit the sharing of this information with the Congress and we're going to insist on it."
Schiff said he is particularly concerned about the Trump Tower Moscow project, the real estate development Cohen was pitching to the Kremlin while Trump was running for president.
He noted that when it first emerged that Cohen had emailed Putin's office seeking help, Putin's spokesman, Dmitri Pescov, said he never answered the email. But it later emerged in court documents that an assistant to Pescov did respond, emailing Cohen and asking him to call, which he did.
"So here we had the Kremlin facilitating a cover up by the president of the United States," Schiff said. "This needs to be exposed."
Ken Dilanian is a national security reporter for the NBC News Investigative Unit.
Read the whole story
· · · · · · · · ·
Three years ago today, the personal email account of the chairman of the Clinton campaign, John Podesta, was hacked by an elite unit in Russia’s military intelligence service, the GRU. (Full disclosure: he is the founder of CAP Action, which you probably already know).
This hacking effort was part of a yearlong campaign by Russian intelligence directed against the Clinton campaign and Trump opponents, an effort that left zero question about the prevalence of interference in the 2016 election. There were two campaigns to elect Donald Trump in 2016: a campaign run out of Trump Tower (the Trump campaign) and a campaign run out of the Kremlin (the Russian campaign).
In the three years since the Podesta hack, Mueller’s wave of indictments detailed just how massive the Russian campaign was. The Russian campaign often had the resources of a presidential campaign, with the added advantage of being bolstered by the immense capabilities of Russia’s intelligence services.
The Campaign
- Russia had a digital team the size of a modern presidential campaign: Housed in the St. Petersburg-based Internet Research Agency (IRA), the Russian campaign had a digital wing that was roughly the size of the Clinton campaign’s digital team based in Brooklyn. The Russians exploited the openness of social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram to spread disinformation online and helped to promote Trump.
- Estimates indicate that the IRA employed anywhere from hundreds to a thousand They also had 80 people just devoted to influencing the US population, which was about the same size of the Clinton campaign’s digital team.
- Russia’s digital campaign had a multi-million dollar budget, funded by a close Putin ally, who has been indicted and sanctioned. The project to interfere in the US had a $1.25 million monthly budget in 2016.
- Russia’s digital campaign was influential on social media, with some accounts gaining more than 100,000 followers. The IRA set up fake personas on social media platforms, deploying politically-driven messages that sought to bolster Trump, sow discord, and amplify extremist voices. For example, the IRA-twitter account @TEN_GOP falsely claimed to be the Tennessee Republican party and gained more than 100,000 followers.
- They also created issue specific groups on Facebook and Instagram that amassed “hundreds of thousands of followers.” These include IRA-created groups like “Secured Borders,” “South United” and “United Muslims of America.”
- Russia’s digital campaign organized at least eight political rallies in the U.S. This included demonstrations titled “March for Trump” and “Miners for Trump.”
- For example, the IRA used the Facebook group “Being Patriotic” and the Twitter account @March_for_Trump to coordinate a series of rallies in Florida.
- They even paid people to build a cage and wear a prison uniform pretending to by Hillary Clinton.
- Russia’s digital campaign bought ads on social media, spending “thousands of U.S. dollars every month.” One advertisement in May read, “Hillary Clinton Doesn’t Deserve the Black Vote.” Another in October said “Among all the candidates Donald Trump is the one and only who can defend the police from terrorists.”
- Russia’s digital campaign sought to depress Clinton’s turnout by targeting African Americans. The IRA leeched off the popularity of the Black Lives Matter movement, setting up dozens of fake activist social media pages, including the Facebook group “Blacktivist.”
- Russia’s digital campaign conducted reconnaissance missions to prepare for the election. Operatives from the IRA visited the U.S. as early as 2014 to prepare for the election, going to and collecting intelligence in Nevada, California, New Mexico, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, Louisiana, Texas, New York, and Georgia.
- Russia also used traditional propaganda outlets like Russia’s state-owned channels RT and Sputnik. These were used to elevate and amplify stories, spread disinformation, and to provide a platform for third-party candidates like Jill Stein.
The Hack
- Russian intelligence engaged in a massive cyber hacking campaign, targeting 76 Clinton campaign staffers. Russian hackers conducted extensive cyberoperations during the 2016 election cycle. They stole information from both Democratic and Republican targets – but only released information on Democrats.
- Russia released some, but not all, of the stolen content through WikiLeaks in a manner designed to help Donald Trump.
- The DNC emails were released on the Friday before the DNC convention, massively disrupting what was supposed to be a unifying event after a divisive primary.
- John Podesta’s emails were leaked on a Friday afternoon, just 29 minutes after the release of the Access Hollywood video.
The Assets
Russia used its intelligence assets as part of its campaign, particularly to liaise with the Trump campaign. Some were clear Russian agents knowingly working on Russia’s behalf, while others with previously known links may have acted unwittingly.
- The Trump campaign passed polling data to a suspected Russian intelligence agent. Konstantin Kilimnik was Paul Manafort’s right hand man and is suspected to have ties with Russian intelligence.
- Maria Butina sought to infiltrate the NRA and connect with key Republican leaders. According to her guilty plea, Butina said “circumstances were favorable for building relations with” the GOP, predicting in 2015 that whoever the Republican nominee was would win the election.
- The June 9th, 2016 meeting in Trump Tower that included Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, and Jared Kushner was also attended by Rinat Akhmetshin, a Washington lobbyist and alleged former Soviet counter-intelligence officer, as well as a Russian government lawyer with ties to the Russian Prosecutor General.
- Joseph Mifsud, a “Maltese professor,” informed the Trump campaign in April 2016 that the Russians had “thousands of emails” and had “dirt” on Clinton.
- A suspected Russian agent was on the Trump campaign. Carter Page, according to the FISA warrant released in the Nunes memo, was suspected by the FBI to be a Russian agent. He traveled to Moscow during the campaign, delivering a foreign policy speech that parroted Kremlin talking points.
These three lines of effort created a powerful and robust Russian campaign to elect Donald Trump. And there was no bright line separating the Russian campaign from the Trump campaign. They were in constant contact, with at least 28 meetings and more than 100 contacts between Trump officials and Kremlin-linked figures. Three years since the Podesta hack, the Trump administration’s inaction in response to such a massive attack on our democracy continues to be a national security risk.
Read the whole story
· · · · ·
But if Mueller hasn't looked at Trump's relationship the German bank, Schiff said, "they have not done a diligent investigation of money laundering.".
Former FBI Director James Comey explains why it’s so hard to prosecute white-collar criminals, as 2020 Democrats slam ‘two systems of justice’ CNBC WILLIAMSBURG, Va. — Democratic presidential contenders want Wall Street executives locked up for crimes committed on their watch — but former FBI … “political crimes” – Google News Crime and Criminology from Michael_Novakhov …
WILLIAMSBURG, Va. — Democratic presidential contenders want Wall Street executives locked up for crimes committed on their watch — but former FBI Director James Comey, once the top prosecutor in Manhattan, said it might not be so easy.
Comey, who served as the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York in the days after the dotcom meltdown of the early 2000s, weighed in on the matter on Friday during a rare question-and-answer session at his alma mater William & Mary.
Responding to a student who asked about the lack of major prosecutions after the 2007 financial crisis, Comey said that unlike drug prosecutions, white-collar cases require prosecutors to demonstrate that the person they are charging knew what they were doing was wrong at the time.
“Show me that these bank CEOs, when they engaged in these transactions, knew they were involved in a fraudulent transaction. It is incredibly difficulty to do,” Comey said.
He said that the difficulty was at times dispiriting, but defended his record and the record of those who followed him.
Some of Comey’s successors as Manhattan’s U.S. attorney, including Preet Bharara, who took the job in 2009, have been criticized for failing to go after those responsible for the financial crisis and instead taking on cases that were easier to prosecute.
“It’s frustrating to me, but I can’t imagine the country being any different,” Comey said. “I don’t want to change the burden of proof, I don’t want to lower any of those things. There’s lots of things I want to do to try to make it harder for bad people to do bad things, but my reaction is: I’m proud of what I did.”
Attention on white-collar crime has heated up as a result of the Democratic presidential primary, which features a number of lawmakers who have made addressing inequities in the criminal justice system a central element of their pitch to voters.
The nation’s attention was focused on the matter earlier this month, after President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort received a sentence of about seven years for a slew of crimes including fraud, a duration that fell far short of what federal sentencing guidelines recommended
The sentence drew scrutiny not just from liberal Democrats like Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., who has vowed to increase the criminal liability of big bank executives, but also from more moderate contenders like Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., a former prosecutor. Klobuchar at the time slammed what she called “two systems of justice.”
“Crimes committed in an office building should be treated as seriously as crimes committed on a street corner,” Klobuchar wrote in a post on Twitter.
But Comey said that, in effect, crimes committed in an office building are fundamentally harder to prosecute.
“It’s very, very hard to make cases against senior people,” Comey said.
Comey said that, in a drug case, prosecutors have a mission to connect individuals to the transaction. He said that, for instance, if there is a kilo of heroin on the table, “and we are all sitting around it, and the DEA kicks in the door, everybody is going to jail.”
“It’s not open to anybody to say, ‘My lawyer has looked at this kilo.’ Or, ‘My accountant has reviewed this kilo.’ Or, ’If you look at footnote 17 of our disclosure, this kilo is mentioned,” he said.
Comey said that the process for white-collar cases was the reverse.
“At the end of the white collar investigation, I will know everyone who was at the table,” Comey said. “Mortgage backed securities out the wazoo, we will untangle it. But then, we have to prove that everybody involved in the transaction knew it was wrong. And then they can say, well, ‘Moody’s looked at this.’ Or, ‘My law firm looked at this. It never occurred to me that this might be wrong.’”
Experts have said that other reasons also account for disparities in the frequency of prosecutions and the length of sentencing for white-collar crime, versus drug offenses and other criminal violations.
Career ambitions on the part of the prosecutor often play a role, according to Brett Curry, a professor at Georgia Southern University who recently co-authored the book “U.S. Attorneys, Political Control, and Career Ambition.”
“There has been an increase in the propensity of former prosecutors to pivot into the white-collar defense bar,” Curry said in an interview. He said that prosecutors “want to seem serious” — so they don’t avoid white-collar prosecutions entirely — but that they also “look across the table at the people who might want to hire” them.
The reporter Jesse Eisinger made a similar argument in his 2017 book, “The Chickensh-- Club,” which describes a “symbiotic” relationship between top law firms and the Department of Justice.
That book got its title from Comey, who used the phrase pejoratively to describe young prosecutors who had never lost a case and feared taking on challenging prosecutions that could blemish their record.
“Jim Comey was saying to young prosecutors that their job was not about winning, that they couldn’t be focused on just getting their best record that they could get — taking the low hanging fruit,” Eisinger said in a 2017 radio interview.
“Their job was about more than that. It was about doing justice. And so he was urging his prosecutors to [try] ambitious cases, righteous cases, and not to worry about winning and certainly not to behave as if winning was the only thing that mattered.”
Read the whole story
· · · ·
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 3
Stream your PBS favorites with the PBS app: https://to.pbs.org/2Jb8twG
Find more from PBS NewsHour at https://www.pbs.org/newshour
Subscribe to our YouTube channel: https://bit.ly/2HfsCD6
Find more from PBS NewsHour at https://www.pbs.org/newshour
Subscribe to our YouTube channel: https://bit.ly/2HfsCD6
Follow us:
Facebook: http://www.pbs.org/newshour
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/newshour
Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/newshour
Snapchat: @pbsnews
Facebook: http://www.pbs.org/newshour
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/newshour
Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/newshour
Snapchat: @pbsnews
Subscribe:
PBS NewsHour podcasts: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/podcasts
Newsletters: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/subscribe
PBS NewsHour podcasts: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/podcasts
Newsletters: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/subscribe
Mr Enrich, I have some questions for you as the expert on this subject, and I would appreciate your answers, according to your knowledge:
- Did Deutsche Bank sell Trump-Kushner's Debt to Russian Sberbank and VTB?
- Did the group of Russian Oligarchs act as guarantors for this debt sale?
- Was the handling of Trump-Kushner accounts supervised by Ernst Uhrlau, a former chief of BND, and later "a consultant for global geopolitical risks" for Deutsche Bank?
- What are the relations of Deutsche Bank with the German Intelligence and with the hypothetical New Abwehr?
- What are the underlying factors in the very, extraordinary close relationship between Deutsche Bank and Sberbank?
- What is the status of the Trump-Kushner's Debts and their finances at this time?
Thank you, Michael Novakhov
2:45 PM 3/19/2019
Comment in NYTimes
-
Jan 9, 2019 - M.N. | "Had Deutsche sold any part of Trump's debt to foreign entities? ... Did Trumpaccept Russian sources of funding during these times? ... Jared Kushner, Ivanka, and Kushner'smother Seryl Stadtmauer were all ..... A Kremlin bank, VTB, had seemingly captured Deutsche Bank'sMoscow outpost.
Read the whole story
· ·
U.S. President Donald Trump's combative envoy to Germany, Richard Grenell continues to draw fire from German officials for trying to intervene in the country's affairs.
"Mr Grenell is a total diplomatic failure," Carsten Schneider, head of the Social Democratic Party (SPD)' s parliamentary caucus, told the dpa in Berlin after ambassador Grenell criticized Berlin's decision to move more slowly toward the NATO spending target of 2 percent of gross domestic product.
Grenell's tone had long been inappropriate to relations between close allies, Schneider said, charging the ambassador with failure to recognize Germany's contribution within the alliance, in Afghanistan for example.
"Mr Grenell is harming transatlantic relations with his repeated heavy-handed remarks," he said.
Grenell has also faced criticism for his handling of U.S.-German disagreements over trade, a 2015 Iran nuclear deal and the Russian-led Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline.
The envoy last week warned German Economy Minister Peter Altmaier in a letter that security concerns could throttle U.S. intelligence sharing with Berlin if Huawei got a role in Germany's 5G next-generation mobile infrastructure.
Merkel told reporters the German government was keenly focused on security of digital networks, including the 5G mobile infrastructure, but Berlin would keep its own counsel.
Michael Grosse-Broemer, a conservative leader in parliament, said Germany was competent to address its own security, adding, "There is no need for pointers from the U.S. ambassador."
Grenell also sparked controversy in Germany when he warned German firms to start closing down their business operations in Iran.
His threat to slap sanctions on German firms involved in the Nord Stream 2 pipeline also proved counterproductive, shutting down potential critics of the project as German politicians are reluctant to be seen as bowing to U.S. pressure, experts said.
"Political smoothness is not his thing and he's proud of that. You could say he was the most undiplomatic diplomat Washington ever had here," said Ruediger Lentz, executive director the Aspen Institute Germany.
'Total diplomatic failure': Trump-appointed envoy blasted by German officials Daily Sabah
"Trump digital operations" - Google News
U.S. President Donald Trump's combative envoy to Germany, Richard Grenell continues to draw fire from German officials for trying to intervene in the...
Trump's financial ties with Deutsche Bank are the subject of investigations by two congressional committees and the New York attorney general.
The Russian Campaign to Elect Donald Trump by Siena Cicarelli
The post The Russian Campaign to Elect Donald Trump appeared first on The Moscow Project.
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 4
Trump's Re-Election Campaign Is Focusing Efforts on Facebook Fortune
"social media in trump campaign" - Google News
President Donald Trump's re-election campaign is quietly spending millions of dollars on Facebook and Google ads ahead of 2020.
Russia has banned fake news, while also being one of the world's prime exporters of fake news Business Insider
Russian president Vladimir Putin signed a new law that heavily fines those who spread those who spread what the state decides is fake news. Russia is one of ...
A just-released blockbuster report by the New York Times is shedding light on just how far Deutsche Bank went to vouch for Donald Trump, despite numerous red flags. New York Times Finance Editor David Enrich joins Stephanie Ruhle to break it all down.March 19, 2019
Deutsche Bank loaned more than $2 billion to Trump over two ...
CNBC-15 hours ago
Deutsche Bank loaned more than $2 billion to Donald Trump before he became president — despite multiple red flags surrounding his ...
Trump-Deutsche Bank ties a “bond born of necessity and ambition ...
Local Source-The Real Deal-3 hours ago
Local Source-The Real Deal-3 hours ago
Deutsche Bank and Trump: $2 Billion in Loans and a Wary Board
Local Source-New York Times-20 hours ago
Local Source-New York Times-20 hours ago
How President Trump is connected to Deutsche Bank
MSNBC-4 hours ago
A just-released blockbuster report by the New York Times is shedding light on just how far Deutsche Bank went to vouch for Donald Trump, ...
Trump Lied About Assets, Worth to Get Deutsche Bank Loans: Report
Daily Beast-18 hours ago
Between the late 1990s and 2016, Deutsche Bank was reportedly willing to lend President Trumpmoney to grow his real estate business ...
Read the whole story
· ·
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 5
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 6
A just-released blockbuster report by the New York Times is shedding light on just how far Deutsche Bank went to vouch for Donald Trump, despite numerous red flags. New York Times Finance Editor David Enrich joins Stephanie Ruhle to break it all down.
» Subscribe to MSNBC: http://on.msnbc.com/SubscribeTomsnbc
» Subscribe to MSNBC: http://on.msnbc.com/SubscribeTomsnbc
MSNBC delivers breaking news and in-depth analysis of the headlines, as well as informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, Hardball, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and more.
Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com: http://on.msnbc.com/Readmsnbc
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter: MSNBC.com/NewslettersYouTube
Find MSNBC on Facebook: http://on.msnbc.com/Likemsnbc
Follow MSNBC on Twitter: http://on.msnbc.com/Followmsnbc
Follow MSNBC on Instagram: http://on.msnbc.com/Instamsnbc
Visit msnbc.com: http://on.msnbc.com/Readmsnbc
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter: MSNBC.com/NewslettersYouTube
Find MSNBC on Facebook: http://on.msnbc.com/Likemsnbc
Follow MSNBC on Twitter: http://on.msnbc.com/Followmsnbc
Follow MSNBC on Instagram: http://on.msnbc.com/Instamsnbc
President Donald Trump & His Extensive Connections To Deutsche Bank | Velshi & Ruhle | MSNBC
-
-
German politicians brand US ambassador a 'brat' and a 'total diplomatic failure' and demand he be expelled after he criticised their plans to cut NATO spending
- Richard Grenell slammed Germany's 'worrisome' plans to cut defence spending
- His comments sparked fury in Berlin where politicians accused him of meddling
- One MP said he was acting like the 'high commissioner of an occupying power'
- Donald Trump has accused NATO allies of freeloading on U.S. military might
By Tim Stickings For Mailonline and Afp
Published: 06:25 EDT, 20 March 2019 | Updated: 07:39 EDT, 20 March 2019
German politicians have reacted with fury after the U.S. ambassador criticised Berlin's plans to cut defence spending.
Richard Grenell slammed Germany's 'worrisome' budget plans which would see military outlays fall well below the NATO target of two per cent of GDP.
His comments were the latest flashpoint in a long-running row with Donald Trump, who has accused NATO allies of expecting a 'free ride' on Washington's military might.
Grenell - who has frequently clashed with Berlin - is now facing calls to be expelled as U.S. envoy.
German politicians have reacted with fury after the U.S. ambassador, Richard Grenell (pictured), criticised Berlin's plans to cut defence spending below NATO targets
Wolfgang Kubicki of the liberal FDP party demanded that Grenell be declared 'persona non grata', Der Spiegel reported.
'Someone who acts like the high commissioner of an occupying power needs to learn that there are limits to our tolerance,' he said.
Social Democratic Party whip Carsten Schneider called Grenell a 'brat' and a 'total diplomatic failure', according to German media.
His party colleague Johannes Kahrs said it was 'unbelievable who can become a U.S. ambassador these days'.
Fellow SPD member Ralf Stegner said: 'Mr Grenell behaves in the way you expect from the Trump administration: uncouth, boorish and politically unsuited to the role.
'Our relationship with the U.S. is more important than Trump or Grenell.'
Left Party MP Helin Evrim Sommer said: 'The expulsion of the Trumpist Grenell from Germany is overdue.
'Someone who meddles in the internal affairs of other states like a feudal lord disqualifies themselves as a U.S. ambassador'.
U.S. President Donald Trump (left) has repeatedly accused Berlin of freeloading on Washington's military might but Angela Merkel (right) rejected the American criticism
However a right-wing AfD member came to Grenell's defence, saying: 'You only expel ambassadors in extreme cases, for example at the start of warlike confrontation.'
During the 2016 presidential campaign Trump said some NATO allies were 'getting a free ride', calling it 'unfair'.
In 2018 Washington spent nearly $700 billion on defence, compared with just $280 billion for all the European NATO allies combined.
Germany's finance ministry had yesterday presented its budget planning for coming years, which signalled a drop.
It said defence spending would first rise to 1.37 percent of gross domestic product in 2020 but then likely fall back to 1.25 percent by 2023.
While German defence spending went up from $45 billion to $50 billion last year, the growing economy meant the figure relative to GDP stayed flat at 1.23 per cent.
Chancellor Angela Merkel pushed back against the U.S. criticism by arguing that Germany was as focused on foreign aid as on military spending.
Bundeswehr recruits march to be sworn in at the ministry of defence in Berlin, Germany. Angela Merkel has insisted that Germany will not cut aid spending to increase its military
'We have always said that we're headed in the direction of two percent, and that by 2024 we will reach 1.5 percent,' she said.
'I can understand that this is not enough for the American President, it's not enough for many European allies.'
Grenell took up his Berlin posting on May 8 last year.
The envoy immediately irked Germany when he tweeted that day that German companies should stop doing business with Iran, after Trump tore up the nuclear deal.
He stoked further outrage with reported comments to right-wing news website Breitbart of his ambition to 'empower other conservatives throughout Europe, other leaders.'
Grenell also raised eyebrows by describing Austria's arch-conservative Chancellor Sebastian Kurz as a 'rock star.'
Recently he appeared to threaten that the U.S. would cut back its intelligence co-operation with Germany if Berlin used Chinese firm Huawei in its 5G telecome infrastructure.
Advertisement
Share or comment on this article:
Read the whole story
· · · · ·
German politicians have reacted with fury after the U.S. ambassador ... 'Our relationship with the U.S. is more important than Trump or Grenell. ... its intelligence co-operation with Germany if Berlin used Chinese firm Huawei in its 5G ...
Comments
Post a Comment